Literature DB >> 11270827

Clinical features in patients requiring reoperation after failed endoscopic procedures for hydrocephalus.

N Hayashi1, H Hamada, Y Hirashima, M Kurimoto, A Takaku, S Endo.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical features of patients at risk of secondary obstruction following endoscopic fenestration. Clinical notes and endoscopic findings for 15 patients treated with endoscopic procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was performed as initial treatment in 4 patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus, including a neonate with myelomeningocele, and as an alternative to shunt revision in 4 patients. Two patients with non-communicating hydrocephalus caused by tumor or arachnoid cyst were also managed with third ventriculostomy. Four patients with loculated hydrocephalus underwent endoscopic septostomy. A child with an isolated fourth ventricle was treated with endoscopic aqueductoplasty. Of the 15 patients undergoing endoscopic procedure, 4 required reoperation. Of the 10 patients treated with ETV, only the neonate with myelomeningocele required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of failure of the initial procedure. Of the 4 patients treated with endoscopic septostomy, 2 children with loculated hydrocephalus following intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) underwent a second septostomy. In a patient with an isolated fourth ventricle following posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus, recurrence was noted 8 months after the initial procedure. He underwent a second procedure using a stent implanted into the aqueduct to maintain CSF circulation. Sufficient stomal size or implantation of a stent may be required in the under-2-year age group with hydrocephalus accompanied by IVH and associated with myelomeningocele, in whom the risk of secondary obstruction may be high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11270827     DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-11377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg        ISSN: 0946-7211


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management strategies for treatment of the trapped fourth ventricle.

Authors:  David H Harter
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Shunts vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: are there different types and/or rates of complications? A review.

Authors:  C Di Rocco; L Massimi; G Tamburrini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-10-20       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  Núria Bargalló; Lourdes Olondo; Ana I Garcia; Sebastian Capurro; Luis Caral; Jordi Rumia
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Neuroendoscopic septostomy in unilateral and bilateral ventricular hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Kevin Armas-Melián; Bienvenido Ros; Lenin Gómez-Barreno; Sara Iglesias; Miguel Ángel Arráez
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.532

Review 5.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Dieter Hellwig; Joachim Andreas Grotenhuis; Wuttipong Tirakotai; Thomas Riegel; Dirk Michael Schulte; Bernhard Ludwig Bauer; Helmut Bertalanffy
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-11-27       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Dual-trajectory Approach for Simultaneous Cyst Fenestration and Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy for Treatment of a Complex Third Ventricular Arachnoid Cyst.

Authors:  Allen L Ho; Arjun V Pendharkar; Eric S Sussman; Vinod K Ravikumar; Gordon H Li
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-03-05

7.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children younger than 2 years of age.

Authors:  Jörg Baldauf; J Oertel; Michael R Gaab; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 1.532

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.