An analysis of consumer perspectives following contact with an eating-disorders service.

OBJECTIVE: The views of consumers following contact with treatment for eating disorders represent an underresearched aspect of service provision. The aim of this paper is to examine patterns of consumer satisfaction following contact with a specialist eating-disorders service.
METHOD: Using both a structured and an open-ended questionnaire format, consumer perspectives were sought routinely through postal survey 3 months after the point of first contact. Responses were analysed from 120 patients who returned their questionnaires during the 2-year period ending in December 1998.
RESULTS: Although the structured response format indicated high rates of satisfaction, the open-ended format revealed five categories describing the perceived best and worst aspects following consultation with the service. The category of therapeutic alliance drew the majority of positive comments, while the most frequently cited worst aspect of consultation was the category of treatment type.
CONCLUSIONS: People with eating disorders form a unique group of mental health consumers to survey for satisfaction. While approval ratings prompted by both structured and open-ended questions were high, and centred around the theme of therapeutic alliance, the most frequent source of negative commentary was activities and structures considered essential by traditional treatment modalities. This provides important insights into the predicaments of people with eating disorders presenting for treatment, and the importance of developing satisfaction surveys to accommodate such predicaments and concerns.