Literature DB >> 11268113

Qualitative and quantitative olfactometric evaluation of different concentrations of ethanol peppermint oil solutions.

D Krone1, M Mannel, E Pauli, T Hummel.   

Abstract

Selection of an adequate placebo is a major problem in clinical trials of Euminz(R) (10% peppermint oil/ethanol) which is used topically for the treatment of tension-type headache. This randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over study was performed to investigate whether there are qualitative differences between 10%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0% peppermint oil. Forty-one healthy subjects participated (age range 21-28 years); they rated both intensity, and hedonic tone of the stimuli. Verbal descriptions were combined to multiple response sets (MRS). In addition, the trigeminal impact of odorants was determined. Intensity ratings and MRS "menthol like" and "alcohol/solvent" changed with stimulus concentration. However, intensity had no significant effect on hedonics, trigeminal impact, or the number of descriptive items used. When MRS "menthol like" and "alcohol/solvent" were analysed after being weighted with intensity ratings, changes in relation to stimulus concentration were lost. Thus, the differences between the five concentrations of peppermint oil were--to their largest part--due to changes in stimulus intensity. Considering the large day-to-day variability of olfactory sensitivity the present data support the hypothesis that the odour quality of 10% peppermint oil cannot be discriminated from the odour of 0.1%, 0.5%, or 1% peppermint oil when tested on separate days. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11268113     DOI: 10.1002/ptr.716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytother Res        ISSN: 0951-418X            Impact factor:   5.878


  12 in total

1.  Olfactory pattern classification by discrete neuronal network states.

Authors:  Jörn Niessing; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  From molecule to mind: an integrative perspective on odor intensity.

Authors:  Joel D Mainland; Johan N Lundström; Johannes Reisert; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Intranasal localizability of odorants: influence of stimulus volume.

Authors:  J Frasnelli; T Hummel; J Berg; G Huang; R L Doty
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Complementary codes for odor identity and intensity in olfactory cortex.

Authors:  Kevin A Bolding; Kevin M Franks
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Odor coding in piriform cortex: mechanistic insights into distributed coding.

Authors:  Robin M Blazing; Kevin M Franks
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  A primacy code for odor identity.

Authors:  Christopher D Wilson; Gabriela O Serrano; Alexei A Koulakov; Dmitry Rinberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Glomerular input patterns in the mouse olfactory bulb evoked by retronasal odor stimuli.

Authors:  Yuichi Furudono; Ginny Cruz; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 8.  Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species.

Authors:  Clara U Raithel; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 9.052

9.  Odor concentration invariance by chemical ratio coding.

Authors:  Naoshige Uchida; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-08

10.  Measuring the olfactory bulb input-output transformation reveals a contribution to the perception of odorant concentration invariance.

Authors:  Douglas A Storace; Lawrence B Cohen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.