Literature DB >> 11267717

Non-invasive early prenatal diagnosis using fluorescent in situ hybridization on transcervical cells: comparison of two different methods for retrieval.

T ErgIn1, V Baltaci, H B Zeyneloglu, E H Duran, M H ErgenelI, S Batioglu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficiencies of uterine and endocervical lavage to retrieve fetal cells from first trimester pregnancies for further analysis with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). STUDY
DESIGN: Transcervical cell (TCC) samples were collected at 7-10 weeks of gestations by uterine lavage (13 women) and by endocervical lavage (12 women) who were scheduled for volunteer termination of pregnancy. A sample of placenta was also obtained for cytogenetic analysis to confirm the sex or genotype in the end of the procedure. FISH was performed using probes for the chromosomes 18, X and Y in a three color hybridization protocol. The statistical analysis included chi(2)-analysis, and t-test.
RESULTS: Sufficient cells were obtained in 12 of the 13 (92.3%) in uterine lavage and 10 of the 12 (83.3%) in endocervical lavage group for FISH procedures for fetal sex prediction. The mean success rate of signal detection for FISH procedure was 91.7% (range 83-97%). Fetal sex was correctly predicted in 11 of 12 (91.6%) with uterine lavage and 8 of 10 (80.0%) in endocervical lavage and the difference was statistically insignificant.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that there are available cells of fetal origin in the lower part of the uterus and these cells may be collected successfully as early as 7 weeks of the gestation. In addition, our results show that endocervical lavage method is as effective as uterine lavage. FISH has been successfully used to detect status of aneuploidy and sex of the fetus from TCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11267717     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00357-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  4 in total

Review 1.  Transcervical retrieval of fetal cells in the practice of modern medicine: a review of the current literature and future direction.

Authors:  Anthony N Imudia; Sanjeev Kumar; Michael P Diamond; Alan H DeCherney; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Retrieval of trophoblast cells from the cervical canal for prediction of abnormal pregnancy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anthony N Imudia; Yoko Suzuki; Brian A Kilburn; Frank D Yelian; Michael P Diamond; Roberto Romero; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Prenatal diagnosis of common aneuploidies in transcervical samples using quantitative fluorescent-PCR analysis.

Authors:  Cecilia Bussani; Riccardo Cioni; Alberto Mattei; Massimiliano Fambrini; Mauro Marchionni; Gianfranco Scarselli
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 4.  Trophoblast retrieval and isolation from the cervix: origins of cervical trophoblasts and their potential value for risk assessment of ongoing pregnancies.

Authors:  Gerit Moser; Sascha Drewlo; Berthold Huppertz; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 15.610

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.