Literature DB >> 11266668

Trunk stiffness increases with steady-state effort.

M G Gardner-Morse1, I A Stokes.   

Abstract

Trunk stiffness was measured in healthy human subjects as a function of steady-state preload efforts in different horizontal loading directions. Since muscle stiffness increases with increased muscle activation associated with increasing effort, it is believed that coactivation of muscles helps to stiffen and stabilize the trunk. This paper tested whether increased steady-state preload effort increases trunk stiffness. Fourteen young healthy subjects each stood in an apparatus with the pelvis immobilized. They were loaded horizontally at directions of 0, 45, 90, 135 and 180 degrees to the forward direction via a thoracic harness. Subjects first equilibrated with a steady-state load of 20 or 40% of their maximum extension effort. Then a sine-wave force perturbation of nominal amplitude of 7.5 or 15% of maximum effort and nominal period of 250ms was applied. Both the applied force and subsequent motion were recorded. Effective trunk mass and trunk-driving point stiffness were estimated by fitting the experimental data to a second-order differential equation of the trunk dynamic behavior. The mean effective trunk mass was 14.1kg (s.d.=4.7). The trunk-driving point stiffness increased on average 36.8% (from 14.5 to 19.8N/mm) with an increase in the nominal steady-state preload effort from 20 to 40% (F(1,13)=204.96, p<0.001). There was a smaller, but significant variation in trunk stiffness with loading direction. The measured increase in trunk stiffness probably results from increased muscle stiffness with increased muscle activation at higher steady-state efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266668     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00226-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  24 in total

1.  Altered muscular activation during prone hip extension in women with and without low back pain.

Authors:  Amir M Arab; Leila Ghamkhar; Mahnaz Emami; Mohammad R Nourbakhsh
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2011-08-14

2.  Trunk muscular activation patterns and responses to transient force perturbation in persons with self-reported low back pain.

Authors:  Ian A F Stokes; James R Fox; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Role of reflex dynamics in spinal stability: intrinsic muscle stiffness alone is insufficient for stability.

Authors:  Kevin M Moorhouse; Kevin P Granata
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Low-back biomechanics and static stability during isometric pushing.

Authors:  Kevin R Granata; Bradford C Bennett
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  The effects of trunk stiffness on postural control during unstable seated balance.

Authors:  N Peter Reeves; Vanessa Q Everding; Jacek Cholewicki; David C Morrisette
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Interface stability influences torso muscle recruitment and spinal load during pushing tasks.

Authors:  P J Lee; K P Granata
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Contribution of sensorimotor integration to spinal stabilization in humans.

Authors:  Adam D Goodworth; Robert J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Trunk muscle activities during abdominal bracing: comparison among muscles and exercises.

Authors:  Sumiaki Maeo; Takumi Takahashi; Yohei Takai; Hiroaki Kanehisa
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Modulation of intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stabilization due to vision, task instruction, and perturbation bandwidth.

Authors:  P van Drunen; Y Koumans; F C T van der Helm; J H van Dieën; R Happee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual control of trunk translation and orientation during locomotion.

Authors:  E Anson; P Agada; T Kiemel; Y Ivanenko; F Lacquaniti; J Jeka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.