Literature DB >> 11265829

Older women and mammography screening behavior: do possible selves contribute?

M E Black1, K F Stein, C J Loveland-Cherry.   

Abstract

This study sought to explore the contribution of the self-concept to older women's adherence to regular mammography screening behavior. The PRECEDE and health belief model concepts were incorporated with a measure of the women's future selves to determine whether the self-concept adds to our ability to predict screening. A self-administered questionnaire was completed by 210 community-dwelling women ages 50 to 75 years, recruited from urban and rural women's groups. Logistic regression analyses revealed that predictors of adherence were clinical breast examination, physician recommendation, age, barriers, benefits, feared health-related possible self, and self-efficacy in the feared domain. The addition of the self measures significantly improved the overall fit of the model. Implications for theory development, practice, and future research are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11265829     DOI: 10.1177/109019810102800206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  9 in total

1.  Training community health workers: factors that influence mammography use.

Authors:  Cynthia Kratzke; Laurel Garzon; John Lombard; Karen Karlowicz
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-12

2.  Patient's lung cancer diagnosis as a cue for relatives' smoking cessation: evaluating the constructs of the teachable moment.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Michelle Blocklin; Isaac M Lipkus; William M P Klein; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Prospective effects of possible selves on alcohol consumption in adolescents.

Authors:  Chia-Kuei Lee; Colleen Corte; Karen F Stein; Chang G Park; Lorna Finnegan; Linda L McCreary
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Understanding the role of cancer worry in creating a "teachable moment" for multiple risk factor reduction.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Elaine Puleo; Kathryn I Pollak; Elizabeth C Clipp; Sam Woolford; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  The association between general practitioners' attitudes towards breast cancer screening and women's screening participation.

Authors:  Line Flytkjær Jensen; Thomas Ostersen Mukai; Berit Andersen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy LaPelle; Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Milagros C Rosal; Mary Jo White; Jennifer Rider Stark
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.771

7.  Lasting Effects of the Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on Breast Cancer Detection and Outcomes, Ohio, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Siran M Koroukian; Paul M Bakaki; Xiaozhen Han; Mark Schluchter; Cynthia Owusu; Gregory S Cooper; Susan A Flocke
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  [Awareness of breast cancer screening among general practitioners in Mohammedia (Morocco)].

Authors:  Karima Zine; Samira Nani; Imad Ait Lahmadi; Abderrahmane Maaroufi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-07-15

9.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.