Literature DB >> 11265728

False positive ECG reports of anterior myocardial infarction in women.

R Colaco1, P Reay, C Beckett, T C Aitchison, P W Mcfarlane.   

Abstract

The prevalence of electrocardiographic poor R-wave progression was estimated by reviewing all electrocardiograms recorded in Glasgow Royal Infirmary over a 2-week period. It was found to be higher in women (19% vs. 11%) than in men. To investigate one possible reason, the effect of chest electrode positioning in women was thereafter examined. Eighty four women were recruited to a study in which chest electrodes were placed strictly in adherence with recommendations of using the 4th and 5th intercostal spaces as references and also using the more widely adopted technique of placing electrodes V3 to V6 under the left breast. R wave amplitudes were compared in V3 to V6 from both sets of recordings. It was found that measurements recorded on the breast by electrode V3 have a significantly smaller R wave magnitude compared to corresponding measurements below the breast, the mean difference being 34 (95% confidence interval [CI] of 7 to 60) microvolts. For V5 and V6, the reverse is true with measurements taken on the breast being larger, on average, than those taken below the breast by 119 (95% CI of 87 to 152) and 134 (95% CI of 108 to 160) microvolts respectively. For V4, there was no significant difference. Seventeen women with poor R wave progression suggestive of old anterior myocardial infarction had clinical data examined from which it was determined that 11 had a history suggestive of myocardial infarction, ie, the positive predictive value was 65% (95% CI of 42% to 87%). It was concluded that positioning of electrodes beneath rather than on top of the breast was not responsible for the increased prevalence of poor R wave progression in women and that the criterion of isolated poor R wave progression was too nonspecific to be of clinical value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11265728     DOI: 10.1054/jelc.2000.20359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  7 in total

Review 1.  Technical mistakes during the acquisition of the electrocardiogram.

Authors:  Javier García-Niebla; Pablo Llontop-García; Juan Ignacio Valle-Racero; Guillem Serra-Autonell; Velislav N Batchvarov; Antonio Bayés de Luna
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Precordial electrode placement in women.

Authors:  P W Macfarlane; R Colaco; K Stevens; P Reay; C Beckett; T Aitchison
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Pathological ECG that seemed normal following electrode misplacement.

Authors:  Clement Derkenne; Daniel Jost; Hugues Lefort; Jean-Pierre Tourtier
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-12-05

4.  Electrocardiographic predictors of sudden and non-sudden cardiac death in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Salah S Al-Zaiti; James A Fallavollita; John M Canty; Mary G Carey
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.210

Review 5.  Sex differences in cardiac autonomic regulation and in repolarisation electrocardiography.

Authors:  Peter Smetana; Marek Malik
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  The Impact of Admission Serum Creatinine Derived Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate on Major Adverse Cardiac Events in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Mahmut Uluganyan; Gurkan Karaca; Turker Kemal Ulutas; Ahmet Ekmekci; Eyup Tusun; Ahmet Murat; Bayram Koroglu; Huseyin Uyarel; Nijad Bakhshaliyev; Mehmet Eren
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-02-27

7.  Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with proximal/middle segment of the LAD lesions in patients with ST segment elevation infarction.

Authors:  Ozlem Arican Ozluk; Mustafa Yılmaz; Dursun Topal; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Tezcan Peker; Selcuk Kanat; Kemal Karaagac; Fahriye Vatansever; Utku Parlak
Journal:  Cent Eur J Immunol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.085

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.