Literature DB >> 11265037

RAB-plate versus sliding hip screw for unstable trochanteric hip fractures: stability of the fixation and modes of failure--radiographic analysis of 218 fractures.

R Buciuto1, R Hammer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The sliding hip screw has gained considerable acceptance in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. However, the new type of 120 degrees fixed angle blade-plate with a buttress rod (RAB-plate) showed encouraging clinical results. The purpose of this study was to assess stability of fixation and analyze modes of failure in unstable trochanteric hip fractures treated with these devices.
METHODS: A retrospective radiographic review of 218 unstable fractures was performed. Linear and angular displacements of the major fragments and implant migration into the femoral head during healing were assessed. Additionally, adequacy of the reduction and the location of the implant within the femoral head as predictors of fixation failure were evaluated.
RESULTS: The postreduction neck-shaft angle was maintained in the majority of the fractures in both groups. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of varus angulation by 10 degrees or more by the completion of healing among fractures treated with the sliding hip screw (p = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in vertical migration of the device into the femoral head between the implants used (p = 0.3). There was a significant relationship between failure of the fixation and varus reduction (p = 0.04) as well as screw/neck angle deviation more than 20 degrees in the lateral projection (p = 0.005) or if the implant was in a superior or posterior position (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: The RAB-plate provided a more stable fixation, especially with regard to maintained postoperative alignment. However, positive predictors for fixation failure were identical for both devices. Here, the screw/neck angle deviation has had the strongest significance for prediction of fixation failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11265037     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200103000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  Risk factors for over-telescoping in reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuta Izawa; Kentaro Futamura; Hiroko Murakami; Tetsuya Shirakawa; Masahiro Nishida; Tomonori Baba; Yoshihiko Tsuchida
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 2.  Influence of osteoporosis on fracture fixation--a systematic literature review.

Authors:  J Goldhahn; N Suhm; S Goldhahn; M Blauth; B Hanson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Extramedullary Versus Intramedullary Reduction in Unstable Femoral Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Tadashi Kawamura; Hiroaki Minehara; Ryo Tazawa; Terumasa Matsuura; Rina Sakai; Masashi Takaso
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-25

4.  Accurate and Easy Measurement of Sliding Distance of Intramedullary Nail in Trochanteric Fracture.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Takafumi Hiranaka; Takahiro Niikura; Takaaki Fujishiro; Shinya Hayashi; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Shingo Hashimoto; Yoshitada Sakai; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-05-18

5.  In vitro comparison of resistance to implant failure in unstable trochanteric fractures fixed with intramedullary single screw versus double screw device.

Authors:  Amit Rastogi; Gr Arun; Vakil Singh; Anant Singh; Ashutosh K Singh; Vinay Kumaraswamy
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Limited Dynamic Hip Screw for Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Chunlei Zhang; Bin Zhang; Qirong Dong; Dawei Ge
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-03-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.