OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indication for routine cervical spine radiography in trauma patients. METHODS: Prospective analysis of radiologic and clinical findings was performed during a 5-year period. Patients suitable for a clinical decision rule were reviewed separately. RESULTS: Of the 1,757 consecutive patients included in the study, 38 were diagnosed with a cervical spine injury. Of the 599 patients suitable for the clinical decision rule, 62 had midline cervical tenderness, including 2 with cervical spine injury. No additional cervical spine injuries were found during follow-up. CONCLUSION: It is within good practice, and it is also cost-effective, to obtain a cervical spine radiograph only on clinical parameters in trauma patients with no apparent bodily trauma and optimal parameters. With this clinical decision rule, 30.6% of all cervical spine series were redundant, and no (occult) spinal fractures would have been undetected.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indication for routine cervical spine radiography in traumapatients. METHODS: Prospective analysis of radiologic and clinical findings was performed during a 5-year period. Patients suitable for a clinical decision rule were reviewed separately. RESULTS: Of the 1,757 consecutive patients included in the study, 38 were diagnosed with a cervical spine injury. Of the 599 patients suitable for the clinical decision rule, 62 had midline cervical tenderness, including 2 with cervical spine injury. No additional cervical spine injuries were found during follow-up. CONCLUSION: It is within good practice, and it is also cost-effective, to obtain a cervical spine radiograph only on clinical parameters in traumapatients with no apparent bodily trauma and optimal parameters. With this clinical decision rule, 30.6% of all cervical spine series were redundant, and no (occult) spinal fractures would have been undetected.
Authors: Annelie Slaar; M M Fockens; Junfeng Wang; Mario Maas; David J Wilson; J Carel Goslings; Niels Wl Schep; Rick R van Rijn Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-12-07