Literature DB >> 11264262

Guidelines for referral to a regional genetics service: GPs respond by referring more appropriate cases.

A Lucassen1, E Watson, J Harcourt, P Rose, J O'Grady.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to see whether guidelines on whom to refer to a regional genetics service could improve the appropriateness of referrals to the service. It also aimed to assess whether the genetic clinic assessment of risk agreed with that described in the GP letter.
METHODS: Referral guidelines were sent to all Oxfordshire GPs and the subsequent content of the referral letters was analysed. A retrospective assessment of referral letters sent during the 6 months before dissemination was also made.
RESULTS: The study showed that post-guidelines, fewer "lower risk" referrals were made and that the description of the risk in the GP letter improved, so that a greater proportion of genetic clinic risks agreed with those described in the GP letter.
CONCLUSION: The use of referral guidelines can help GPs to act as gatekeeper for referrals to secondary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11264262     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/18.2.135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the impact of two educational interventions on GP management of familial breast/ovarian cancer cases: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  E Watson; A Clements; P Yudkin; P Rose; C Bukach; J Mackay; A Lucassen; J Austoker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Family physician self-efficacy with screening for inherited cancer risk.

Authors:  Robert Gramling; Justin Nash; Karen Siren; Charles Eaton; Larry Culpepper
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  The use of a family history risk assessment tool within a community health care system: views of primary care providers.

Authors:  Carol A Christianson; Karen Potter Powell; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Susan H Blanton; Jessica Bogacik; Vincent C Henrich
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Retrospective comparison of patient outcomes after in-person and telephone results disclosure counseling for BRCA1/2 genetic testing.

Authors:  Courtney Doughty Rice; Jennifer Gamm Ruschman; Lisa J Martin; Jennifer B Manders; Erin Miller
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Applying theory to characterize impediments to dissemination of community-facing family health history tools: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Caitlin G Allen; Debra Duquette; Yue Guan; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-07-02

Review 7.  What characterizes cancer family history collection tools? A critical literature review.

Authors:  J E Cleophat; H Nabi; S Pelletier; K Bouchard; M Dorval
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Towards establishing consistency in triage in a tertiary specialty.

Authors:  Terri Patricia McVeigh; Deirdre Donnelly; Maryam Al Shehhi; Elizabeth A Jones; Alexandra Murray; Sarah Wedderburn; Mary Porteous; Sally Ann Lynch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Familial risk of cancer and knowledge and use of genetic testing.

Authors:  Heather J Baer; Phyllis Brawarsky; Michael F Murray; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The geography of genetics: an analysis of referral patterns to a cancer genetics service.

Authors:  Kevin McDonald; Rachel Iredale; Gary Higgs
Journal:  Genomic Med       Date:  2008-01-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.