OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to compare high-resolution CT findings of bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia (BOOP) with those of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) and to determine whether high-resolution CT can differentiate the two. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed high-resolution CT scans of 38 patients with BOOP and 43 patients with CEP. Without knowledge of the diagnosis, two radiologists evaluated the frequency and distribution of high-resolution CT findings in both groups of patients and made a diagnosis using a three-point scale of confidence. RESULTS: Nodules, nonseptal linear or reticular opacities, and bronchial dilatation were significantly more common in BOOP than in CEP (31.6% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.005; 44.7% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001; and 57.9% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.005, respectively). Septal line thickening was more frequent in CEP than in BOOP (72.1% vs. 39.5%, p < 0.005). Peribronchial distribution of consolidation was more frequent in BOOP than in CEP (28.9% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.05). A correct diagnosis was made in 69.7% of cases, and the diagnostician was confident in 21.7%. Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Although several of the high-resolution CT findings of BOOP and CEP are different, these diseases are differentiated with confidence in only a small percentage of cases.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research was to compare high-resolution CT findings of bronchiolitis obliterans with organizing pneumonia (BOOP) with those of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP) and to determine whether high-resolution CT can differentiate the two. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed high-resolution CT scans of 38 patients with BOOP and 43 patients with CEP. Without knowledge of the diagnosis, two radiologists evaluated the frequency and distribution of high-resolution CT findings in both groups of patients and made a diagnosis using a three-point scale of confidence. RESULTS: Nodules, nonseptal linear or reticular opacities, and bronchial dilatation were significantly more common in BOOP than in CEP (31.6% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.005; 44.7% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.001; and 57.9% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.005, respectively). Septal line thickening was more frequent in CEP than in BOOP (72.1% vs. 39.5%, p < 0.005). Peribronchial distribution of consolidation was more frequent in BOOP than in CEP (28.9% vs. 9.3%, p < 0.05). A correct diagnosis was made in 69.7% of cases, and the diagnostician was confident in 21.7%. Interobserver agreement was good (kappa = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Although several of the high-resolution CT findings of BOOP and CEP are different, these diseases are differentiated with confidence in only a small percentage of cases.
Authors: Sabine Dettmer; Viktor Grünwald; Thomas Fuehner; Arnold Ganser; Frank Wacker; Philipp Ivanyi; Thomas Rodt Journal: Acta Radiol Open Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Abdullah H Alsaghir; Abdullah F Al-Mobeireek; Hamdan Al-Jahdali; Abdulsalam Al-Eithan; Hadil Al-Otair; Fouad Al-Dayel Journal: Ann Saudi Med Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.526