Literature DB >> 11264083

Value of double-contrast barium enema performed immediately after incomplete colonoscopy.

A L Brown1, S J Skehan, T Greaney, J Rawlinson, S Somers, G W Stevenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ease, completeness, and clinical utility of double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) performed immediately after incomplete colonoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: During a 30-month period, a prospective study was performed in 103 patients (79 women, 24 men) to determine the ease and completeness of DCBE immediately after failed colonoscopy and any additional useful information provided by the enema. The ease with which DCBE was performed was graded from 1 (easy) to 10 (difficult).
RESULTS: DCBE revealed the entire colon in 97 patients (94%). Incomplete DCBE was a result of obstruction and incontinence in three patients each. The mean score for ease of performing DCBE was 5.0. In 14 patients (14%), significant additional diagnostic information was provided by the immediate DCBE. In eight patients, abnormalities were identified on DCBE that had not been seen at colonoscopy (five malignant neoplasms, one diverticular mass, two extrinsic masses, and multiple strictures). In four patients, a suspected colonoscopic abnormality was excluded with DCBE findings; and in two patients, a colonoscopic abnormality was further characterized with DCBE.
CONCLUSION: Immediate DCBE after incomplete colonoscopy allows complete colonic evaluation in most cases, often adds vital diagnostic information, and eliminates repeated bowel preparation and unnecessary delay in diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11264083     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.176.4.1760943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Computed tomographic colonography: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2003-10-01

3.  CT colonography: Friend or foe of practicing endoscopists.

Authors:  Stacy B Menees; Ruth Carlos; James Scheiman; Grace H Elta; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

4.  Laparoscopic ileocecal resection for bowel endometriosis.

Authors:  Giacomo Ruffo; Ania Stepniewska; Stefano Crippa; Giacomo Serboli; Claudio Zardini; Martin Steinkasserer; Marcello Ceccaroni; Luca Minelli; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Correlation of MRI-determined small bowel Crohn's disease categories with medical response and surgical pathology.

Authors:  Ian Craig Lawrance; Christopher J Welman; Peter Shipman; Kevin Murray
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Incomplete colonoscopy in patients with occlusive colorectal cancer: usefulness of CT colonography according to tumor location.

Authors:  Joo Hee Kim; Won Ho Kim; Tae Il Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Myeong-Jin Kim; Ki Whang Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Predictors of incomplete optical colonoscopy using computed tomographic colonography.

Authors:  Reetika Sachdeva; Salina D Tsai; Mohamad H El Zein; Alan A Tieu; Ahmed Abdelgelil; Sepideh Besharati; Mouen A Khashab; Anthony N Kalloo; Vivek Kumbhari
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.485

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.