OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the change in psychosocial state over time and to identify risk factors for maladjustment in gynecologic cancer survivors. Awareness of these issues is important for planning supportive care services for cancer patients. METHODS: A longitudinal prospective study of patients with newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer using individual patients as their own control was performed. Patients were interviewed after confirmation of the diagnosis and were reassessed at 6 and 18 months after completion of treatment and with no evidence of recurrent disease. Psychological adjustment was measured by self-rating on self-esteem, outlook on life, self-role, and femininity. Neuroticism and anxiety were assessed using a neuroticism score and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Depressive symptoms were questioned directly. Social adjustment was assessed by changes in working capacity or work status, leisure activity, marital relationship, and sexual activity. RESULTS: Seventy-four women participated. Adjustment problems did not occur in the majority of patients. Psychosocial adjustment was different for patients receiving different types of treatments. Improvement in feminism (P = 0.050) and neuroticism (P = 0.010) was observed for patients receiving chemotherapy and deterioration was observed in patients treated with surgery. Deterioration in neuroticism was associated with lower education level (P = 0.032). With religious belief, there was better family support and more significant improvement in social activity (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Most patients adapted well. Patients at risk for psychosocial maladjustment include those who are treated surgically, less educated, and without religious belief. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe the change in psychosocial state over time and to identify risk factors for maladjustment in gynecologic cancer survivors. Awareness of these issues is important for planning supportive care services for cancerpatients. METHODS: A longitudinal prospective study of patients with newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer using individual patients as their own control was performed. Patients were interviewed after confirmation of the diagnosis and were reassessed at 6 and 18 months after completion of treatment and with no evidence of recurrent disease. Psychological adjustment was measured by self-rating on self-esteem, outlook on life, self-role, and femininity. Neuroticism and anxiety were assessed using a neuroticism score and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale. Depressive symptoms were questioned directly. Social adjustment was assessed by changes in working capacity or work status, leisure activity, marital relationship, and sexual activity. RESULTS: Seventy-four women participated. Adjustment problems did not occur in the majority of patients. Psychosocial adjustment was different for patients receiving different types of treatments. Improvement in feminism (P = 0.050) and neuroticism (P = 0.010) was observed for patients receiving chemotherapy and deterioration was observed in patients treated with surgery. Deterioration in neuroticism was associated with lower education level (P = 0.032). With religious belief, there was better family support and more significant improvement in social activity (P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Most patients adapted well. Patients at risk for psychosocial maladjustment include those who are treated surgically, less educated, and without religious belief. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.
Authors: Diana S Hoover; Claire A Spears; Damon J Vidrine; Joan L Walker; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; David W Wetter Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2019-05-01
Authors: Kelly Biegler; Lorenzo Cohen; Shellie Scott; Katherine Hitzhusen; Patricia Parker; Chelsea D Gilts; Andrea Canada; Louis Pisters Journal: Integr Cancer Ther Date: 2011-09-30 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Loni Ledderer; Karen la Cour; Ole Mogensen; Erik Jakobsen; René Depont Christensen; Jakob Kragstrup; Helle Ploug Hansen Journal: Patient Date: 2013 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Michael Feuerstein; Briana L Todd; Michal C Moskowitz; Gina L Bruns; Mallori R Stoler; Thomas Nassif; Xinhua Yu Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-10-14 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: A Karahalios; C Baravelli; M Carey; P Schofield; A Pollard; S Aranda; J Franklin; M Jefford Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.442