Literature DB >> 11263935

High incidence of positive peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Y Sonoda1, M Zerbe, A Smith, O Lin, R R Barakat, W J Hoskins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) has evolved into an alternative form of surgical management in the treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether low-risk endometrial cancer patients are subject to a higher incidence of positive peritoneal cytology when treated with LAVH compared to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with low-risk endometrial cancer (grade 1--2 endometrioid type with no evidence of extrauterine spread or grade 3 with <50% myometrial invasion (MI), no cervical or adnexal involvement, and negative lymph nodes when sampled) treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from January 1993 to September 1999. We compared 131 patients treated with LAVH to 246 controls who underwent TAH. The two groups were compared for known prognostic factors including grade, MI, vascular space involvement, and lower uterine segment extension.
RESULTS: The mean age of patients who underwent LAVH (61 years) was similar to that of the controls (62 years). Fourteen (10.3%) of the patients treated with LAVH had positive peritoneal cytology compared to only 7 (2.8%) of the control population. Factors including FIGO grade, myometrial invasion, and preoperative hysteroscopy did not influence the final results. When stratifying for these factors, the odds ratios of having positive peritoneal washings in those patients treated by LAVH were 5.2, 5.2, and 3.7, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of low-risk endometrial cancer by LAVH is associated with a significantly higher incidence of positive peritoneal cytology. This may be due to the retrograde dissemination of cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity during uterine manipulation. The clinical significance of these findings is yet to be determined. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11263935     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  17 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery is a current tide of widely accepted standard procedure for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Suh; Jae Weon Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  Peritoneal washing cytology in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomies: a 10-year experience and reappraisal of its clinical utility.

Authors:  G Landon; J Stewart; M Deavers; K Lu; N Sneige
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  ASO Author Reflections: Is It Safe to Use Intrauterine Manipulators in Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer?

Authors:  Franziska Siegenthaler; Silke Johann; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Prospective Multicenter Trial Assessing the Impact of Positive Peritoneal Cytology Conversion on Oncological Outcome in Patients with Endometrial Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery with the use of an Intrauterine Manipulator : Positive Peritoneal Cytology Conversion and Its Association with Oncological Outcome in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Franziska Siegenthaler; Silke Johann; Sara Imboden; Nicolas Samartzis; Haiyan Ledermann-Liu; Dimitri Sarlos; Markus Eberhard; Michael D Mueller
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-risk endometrial cancer: comparison of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy.

Authors:  Satoe Fujiwara; Ruri Nishie; Shoko Ueda; Syunsuke Miyamoto; Shinichi Terada; Yuhei Kogata; Tomohito Tanaka; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: cohort review of patients with uterine neoplasia.

Authors:  Katherine A O'Hanlan; Gloria Shining Huang; Anne-Caroline Garnier; Suzanne L Dibble; Mirjam L Reuland; Lisbeth Lopez; Rebecca L Pinto
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Lymphovascular space invasion in robotic surgery for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mark R Hopkins; Abby M Richmond; Georgina Cheng; Susan Davidson; Monique A Spillman; Jeanelle Sheeder; Miriam D Post; Saketh R Guntupalli
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 8.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Laparoscopic-assisted staging surgery for Korean women with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jung Hun Lee; Un Suk Jung; Min Sun Kyung; Joong Sub Choi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Associated characteristics and impact on recurrence and survival of free-floating tumor fragments in the lumen of fallopian tubes in Type I and Type II endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Jonathan D Black; Rachel Passarelli; Stefan Gysler; Margaret Whicker; Gary Altwerger; Gulden Menderes; Natalia Buza; Pei Hui; Alessandro D Santin; Masoud Azodi; Dan-Arin Silasi; Elena S Ratner; Babak Litkouhi; Peter E Schwartz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-01-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.