Literature DB >> 11263539

In-utero overgrowth in ruminants following embryo culture: lessons from mice and a warning to men.

K D Sinclair1, L E Young, I Wilmut, T G McEvoy.   

Abstract

Unusually large offspring have been born in ruminants following the transfer to recipients of embryos that have either been subjected to some form of manipulation, e.g. nuclear transfer, or have been exposed to an unusual in-vivo or in-vitro environment. Overgrowth syndromes have been reported in other species, including humans and mice, but these have arisen from chromosomal abnormalities and spontaneous or experimentally induced genetic mutations. Overgrowth phenotypes across the species, however, exhibit many common features, including alterations in organ and tissue development, and placental anomalies. Our current working hypothesis is that the causative agent(s) alter(s) the expression of a gene or genes associated with growth and development. Imprinted genes have been implicated in this syndrome because: (i) similar phenotypes are observed in both humans and mice when the expression of such genes has been altered; and (ii) they may be more vulnerable to epigenetic modification during the period (oocyte to blastocyst) when embryos are cultured in vitro. Evidence supporting this hypothesis is reviewed and the implications for assisted reproduction in humans discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11263539     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/15.suppl_5.68

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  30 in total

1.  Factors affecting the developmental potential of cloned mammalian embryos.

Authors:  J C Cross
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Influence of in vitro manipulation on the stability of methylation patterns in the Snurf/Snrpn-imprinting region in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Axel Schumacher; Walter Doerfler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.

Authors:  Emily L Niemitz; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  Review paper: origin and molecular pathology of adrenocortical neoplasms.

Authors:  M Bielinska; H Parviainen; S Kiiveri; M Heikinheimo; D B Wilson
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.221

5.  Transcriptional profiling by RNA-Seq of peri-attachment porcine embryos generated by a variety of assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  S Clay Isom; John R Stevens; Rongfeng Li; William G Spollen; Lindsay Cox; Lee D Spate; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  The health risks of ART.

Authors:  Daria Grafodatskaya; Cheryl Cytrynbaum; Rosanna Weksberg
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 8.807

7.  Glucose parameters are altered in mouse offspring produced by assisted reproductive technologies and somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Karen A Scott; Yukiko Yamazaki; Miyuki Yamamoto; Yanling Lin; Susan J Melhorn; Eric G Krause; Stephen C Woods; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; Randall R Sakai; Kellie L K Tamashiro
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 8.  Epigenetics and obesity.

Authors:  Reinhard Stöger
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.533

9.  Effects of ooplasm manipulation on DNA methylation and growth of progeny in mice.

Authors:  Yong Cheng; Kai Wang; Lori D Kellam; Young S Lee; Cheng-Guang Liang; Zhiming Han; Namdori R Mtango; Keith E Latham
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 10.  Blastocyst environment and its influence on offspring cardiovascular health: the heart of the matter.

Authors:  Adam J Watkins; Tom P Fleming
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.