OBJECTIVE: To assess retrospectively the clinical value of androgen receptor (AR) levels in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a prognostic factor of the disease. METHODS: Fresh HCC tissue and the surrounding liver tissue were obtained surgically from 32 patients with HCC, and preserved in liquid nitrogen. The levels of AR in all specimens were determined by radio-ligand binding assay. RESULTS: The median level of AR was 42.8 fmol/mg protein in the cancerous tissue and 48.3 fmol/mg protein in the surrounding non-cancerous liver tissue. The overall survival rate of the patients with AR < 30 fmol/mg protein in either HCC or the non-cancerous liver was significantly higher than that of the patients with AR > or = 30 fmol/mg protein (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). The relative risk on prognosis was 3.27 (P < 0.01) for AR level in HCC and 6.06 (P < 0.001) for AR level in the non-cancerous tissue. The main prognostic factors except the tumor size were not different between the group with higher AR level and that with lower AR level in HCC. The AR level in HCC had a positive correlation with the tumor size (r = 0.44, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AR can be detected in HCC and the AR status might be a prognostic parameter that provides additional predictive information on the survival. Different AR status might define a real difference of biological characteristics between HCCs.
OBJECTIVE: To assess retrospectively the clinical value of androgen receptor (AR) levels in primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as a prognostic factor of the disease. METHODS: Fresh HCC tissue and the surrounding liver tissue were obtained surgically from 32 patients with HCC, and preserved in liquid nitrogen. The levels of AR in all specimens were determined by radio-ligand binding assay. RESULTS: The median level of AR was 42.8 fmol/mg protein in the cancerous tissue and 48.3 fmol/mg protein in the surrounding non-cancerous liver tissue. The overall survival rate of the patients with AR < 30 fmol/mg protein in either HCC or the non-cancerous liver was significantly higher than that of the patients with AR > or = 30 fmol/mg protein (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). The relative risk on prognosis was 3.27 (P < 0.01) for AR level in HCC and 6.06 (P < 0.001) for AR level in the non-cancerous tissue. The main prognostic factors except the tumor size were not different between the group with higher AR level and that with lower AR level in HCC. The AR level in HCC had a positive correlation with the tumor size (r = 0.44, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:AR can be detected in HCC and the AR status might be a prognostic parameter that provides additional predictive information on the survival. Different AR status might define a real difference of biological characteristics between HCCs.
Authors: Ho Sung Park; Jun Sang Bae; Sang Jae Noh; Kyung Min Kim; Ho Lee; Woo Sung Moon; Myoung Ja Chung; Myoung Jae Kang; Dong Geun Lee; Kyu Yun Jang Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Mahmoud A Ali; Sahin Lacin; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Mark Uemura; Manal Hassan; Asif Rashid; Dan G Duda; Ahmed O Kaseb Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: S Acosta-Lopez; D Diaz-Bethencourt; T Concepción-Massip; M C Martin-Fernandez de Basoa; A Plata-Bello; A Gonzalez-Rodriguez; F Perez-Hernandez; J Plata-Bello Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Sajeev Wagle; See-Hyoung Park; Kyoung Min Kim; Young Jae Moon; Jun Sang Bae; Keun Sang Kwon; Ho Sung Park; Ho Lee; Woo Sung Moon; Jung Ryul Kim; Kyu Yun Jang Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 4.379