Literature DB >> 11262512

Forbidden fruit: does thinking about a prohibited food lead to its consumption?

T Mann1, A Ward.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The phenomenon of overeating the very foods that one is trying to resist is potentially consistent with both an ironic process account of overeating and a reactance account of the desire for "forbidden fruit." These two models are tested.
METHOD: Participants in two studies were prohibited or not prohibited from eating a food, or they were encouraged to "choose" to avoid it. Food consumption, thoughts, and desire were assessed before and after the food was forbidden.
RESULTS: Consistent with an ironic process account, participants' thoughts about the food increased, regardless of whether they were required to or chose to avoid it. Consistent with a reactance account, participants' desire for the food increased if they were required to avoid it, but not if they chose to avoid it. Participants did not, however, ultimately overeat the forbidden food. DISCUSSION: Neither increased thoughts nor enhanced desire for a food necessarily leads to overindulgence. Copyright 2001 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11262512     DOI: 10.1002/eat.1025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Eat Disord        ISSN: 0276-3478            Impact factor:   4.861


  9 in total

1.  Social safeness and disordered eating: Exploring underlying mechanisms of body appreciation and inflexible eating.

Authors:  Catarina Pinto; Cláudia Ferreira; Ana Laura Mendes; Inês A Trindade
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Normative body dissatisfaction and eating psychopathology in teenage girls: the impact of inflexible eating rules.

Authors:  Cristiana Duarte; Cláudia Ferreira; Inês A Trindade; José Pinto-Gouveia
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Diet type and changes in food cravings following weight loss: findings from the POUNDS LOST Trial.

Authors:  S D Anton; J Gallagher; V J Carey; N Laranjo; J Cheng; C M Champagne; D H Ryan; K McManus; C M Loria; G A Bray; F M Sacks; D A Williamson
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 4.  A Retrospective Literature Review of Eating Disorder Research (1990-2021): Application of Bibliometrics and Topical Trends.

Authors:  Eunhye Park; Woo-Hyuk Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  A Paradox of Ethics: Why People in Good Organizations do Bad Things.

Authors:  Muel Kaptein
Journal:  J Bus Ethics       Date:  2022-05-27

6.  Startling sweet temptations: hedonic chocolate deprivation modulates experience, eating behavior, and eyeblink startle.

Authors:  Jens Blechert; Eva Naumann; Julian Schmitz; Beate M Herbert; Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Believing in food addiction: Helpful or counterproductive for eating behavior?

Authors:  Helen K Ruddock; Paul Christiansen; Andrew Jones; Eric Robinson; Matt Field; Charlotte A Hardman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 8.  Food Addiction Beliefs Amongst the Lay Public: What Are the Consequences for Eating Behaviour?

Authors:  Helen K Ruddock; Charlotte A Hardman
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2017-05-10

9.  Food Craving and Its Relationship with Restriction and Liking in Japanese Females.

Authors:  Sakura Komatsu; Kenjiro Aoyama
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2014-04-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.