Literature DB >> 11262449

Effectiveness of emergency contraceptive pills between 72 and 120 hours after unprotected sexual intercourse.

I Rodrigues1, F Grou, J Joly.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This article reopens the issue of a medical practice that has been well established for more than three decades by proposing an extension of the period during which treatment with the "morning-after" pill is currently prescribed. The objective is to determine the effectiveness of the regimen of Yuzpe and Lancee when it is administered between 72 and 120 hours after sexual intercourse. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted an observational study comparing 2 groups of women for whom the regimen of Yuzpe and Lancee was administered after unprotected sexual intercourse. One group (usual time frame treatment group) sought consultation within 72 hours (n = 131), and the other (extended time frame treatment group) after 72 to 120 hours (n = 169).
RESULTS: The pregnancy rate was 0.8% for the <72-hour group and 1.8% for the 72- to 120-hour group. The effectiveness rate varied from 87% to 90% for the <72-hour group and from 72% to 87% for the 72- to 120-hour group. In both groups the chi(2) tests showed that emergency contraceptive pills significantly reduced the risk of pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Women should be encouraged to seek consultation as quickly as possible after unprotected sexual intercourse. However, if the usual time limit (<72 hours) has expired, the so-called "morning-after" pill should be recommended if an intrauterine contraceptive device is not available. Emergency contraceptive pills have a favorable success rate after 72 hours, with a pregnancy rate that is significantly lower than would be expected if no contraceptive were administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11262449     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.111102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  21 in total

1.  Emergency contraception. Summary of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada's clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  S Dunn; V Davis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 2.  Emergency contraception: a review of current oral options.

Authors:  Marisa N Mendez
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2002-05

3.  Emergency contraception.

Authors:  Anne M C Webb
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

4.  How safe is emergency contraception?

Authors:  Abigail Norris Turner; Charlotte Ellertson
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Recent developments in hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Eleanor A Drey; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  College students' perceptions of emergency contraception provision.

Authors:  Anjel Vahratian; Divya A Patel; Kristen Wolff; Xiao Xu
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Pharmacy students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding emergency contraception.

Authors:  Denise Ragland; Donna West
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Effectiveness of emergency contraception in women after sexual assault.

Authors:  Dong Seok Choi; Miran Kim; Kyung Joo Hwang; Kyoung Mi Lee; Tae Wook Kong
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2013-09-30

9.  Emergency contraception.

Authors:  Dk Katzman; D Taddeo
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Disparities in the provision of sexually transmitted disease and pregnancy testing and prophylaxis for sexually assaulted women in Rhode Island emergency departments.

Authors:  Roland C Merchant; Benjamin Z Phillips; Allison K Delong; Kenneth H Mayer; Bruce M Becker
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.