Literature DB >> 11261344

Continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor.

J S Wolffsohn1, B Gilmartin, E A Mallen, S Tsujimura.   

Abstract

A newly released commercial autorefractor, the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 (Japan), has been found to be valid compared to subjective refraction and repeatable over a wide prescription range. Its binocular open field-of-view allows the accommodative state to be monitored while a natural environment is viewed. In conventional static mode, the device can take up to 45 readings in 1 min using digital image analysis of the reflected retinal image of a measurement ring. Continuous on-line analysis of the ring provides high (up to 60 Hz) temporal resolution of the refractive state to an accuracy of < 0.001 D. Pupil size can also be analysed to a resolution of < 0.001 mm. The measurement of accommodation and pupil size was relatively unaffected by eccentricity of viewing up to +/- 10 degrees and instrument focusing inaccuracies of +/- 5 mm. The resolution properties of the analysis are shown to be ideal for measurement of dynamic accommodation and pupil responses.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11261344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  10 in total

1.  Effects of age on dynamic accommodation.

Authors:  Thurmon E Lockhart; Wen Shi
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Jamie Houser; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Sensitivity of Chaos Measures in Detecting Stress in the Focusing Control Mechanism of the Short-Sighted Eye.

Authors:  Karen M Hampson; Matthew P Cufflin; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Cognitive Demand and Accommodative Microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06

5.  Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?

Authors:  Hanyang Yu; Wentao Li; Ziping Chen; Mengzhen Chen; Junwen Zeng; Xijiang Lin; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Pupil dilation co-varies with memory strength of individual traces in a delayed response paired-associate task.

Authors:  Hedderik van Rijn; Jelle R Dalenberg; Jelmer P Borst; Simone A Sprenger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  How the size of the to-be-learned material influences the encoding and later retrieval of associative memories: A pupillometric assessment.

Authors:  Péter Pajkossy; Mihály Racsmány
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A Comparison Between Refraction From an Adaptive Optics Visual Simulator and Clinical Refractions.

Authors:  Juan Tabernero; Carles Otero; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Pupil size changes signal hippocampus-related memory functions.

Authors:  Péter Pajkossy; Ágnes Szőllősi; Mihály Racsmány
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The effect of image resolution of display types on accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward Ah Mallen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.992

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.