Literature DB >> 11260422

Long-term impact of discontinued or reduced calcineurin inhibitor in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy.

M R Weir1, M T Ward, S A Blahut, D K Klassen, C B Cangro, S T Bartlett, J C Fink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy is the major cause of progressive renal failure in renal transplant recipients. It has no definitive treatment.
METHODS: One hundred eighteen renal transplant recipients with declining kidney function and biopsy-proven chronic allograft nephropathy had their cyclosporine or tacrolimus dose reduced or discontinued with either the addition or continuation of mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose steroids at a mean of 853.3 days post-transplantation. Their renal function was modeled before and after this intervention by two methods: A least-square regression was used to assess the decay of renal function after the intervention and to compare that with the slope pre-intervention, whereas a hinge regression line method was used to assess the correlation of the intervention with the inflection point and the impact of the intervention on the decay of renal function. Mean follow-up was 651.0 days after the intervention. Serum creatinine at the time of intervention was 2.8 +/- 0.9 mg/dL in the reduced dose cyclosporine (N = 67) and reduced dose tacrolimus (N = 33) groups, and was 2.7 +/- 0.7 mg/dL in the group with discontinued calcineurin inhibitor (N = 18).
RESULTS: Using the least-square method, 91.7% of the no calcineurin inhibitor group, 51.6% of the reduced dose cyclosporine group, and 59.3% of the reduced dose tacrolimus group had improved or lack of deterioration in slope after the intervention. Using the hinge regression line method, there was a statistically significant correlation of the inflection point with the intervention (P = 0.001). Moreover, there was a similar relationship with stabilized or improved graft function observed with the hinge regression line method and the least-square method, as 72.2% of the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group, 54.4% of reduced-dose cyclosporine group, and 40% of the reduced-dose tacrolimus group had improved the slope of decay of renal function or lack of deterioration after the inflection point. The difference between the calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal group and the reduced-dose cyclosporine/tacrolimus groups on the decay in renal function was significant (P = 0.038) with the least-square method and nearly significant (P = 0.056) using the hinge regression line method.
CONCLUSION: This intervention was safe, well tolerated, and associated with a minimal risk of acute rejection. We conclude that the reduction and possible withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors may be necessary to slow the rate of loss of renal function in patients with chronic allograft nephropathy and deteriorating renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11260422     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590041567.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  11 in total

1.  Chronic allograft nephropathy and mycophenolate mofetil introduction in paediatric renal recipients.

Authors:  Larissa Kerecuk; Judy Taylor; Godfrey Clark
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.714

2.  Lifetime cost-effectiveness of calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal after de novo renal transplantation.

Authors:  Stephanie R Earnshaw; Christopher N Graham; William D Irish; Reiko Sato; Mark A Schnitzler
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing strategies in renal transplantation, part one: Late sparing strategies.

Authors:  Andrew Scott Mathis; Gwen Egloff; Hoytin Lee Ghin
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-24

4.  Prospective randomized study of azathioprine vs cyclosporine based therapy in primary haplo-identical living-donor kidney transplantation: 20-year experience.

Authors:  Osama A Gheith; Mohamed A Bakr; Mohamed A Fouda; Ahmed A Shokeir; Mohamed Sobh; Mohamed Ghoneim
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 2.801

5.  Early Kidney Allograft Dysfunction (Threatened Allograft): Comparative Effectiveness of Continuing Versus Discontinuation of Tacrolimus and Use of Sirolimus to Prevent Graft Failure: A Retrospective Patient-Centered Outcome Study.

Authors:  Ravinder K Wali; Heather A Prentice; Venkata Reddivari; Geroge Baffoe-Bonnie; Cinthia I Drachenberg; John C Pappadimitriou; Emilio Ramos; Matthew Cooper; Johann Jonsson; Stephen Bartlett; Matthew R Weir
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-08-11

6.  Mycophenolic acid formulations in adult renal transplantation - update on efficacy and tolerability.

Authors:  Déla Golshayan; M Pascual; Bruno Vogt
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 7.  Benefit-risk assessment of ciclosporin withdrawal in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Eric Thervet; Frank Martinez; Christophe Legendre
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 8.  Established and newly proposed mechanisms of chronic cyclosporine nephropathy.

Authors:  Hye Eun Yoon; Chul Woo Yang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Immunological monitoring of renal transplant recipients to predict acute allograft rejection following the discontinuation of tacrolimus.

Authors:  Ellen Kreijveld; Hans J P M Koenen; Bram van Cranenbroek; Esther van Rijssen; Irma Joosten; Luuk B Hilbrands
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reduced Tacrolimus Trough Level Is Reflected by Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Changes in Stable Renal Transplantation Recipients: Results of the OPTIMUM Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Sehoon Park; Yon Su Kim; Jungpyo Lee; Wooseong Huh; Chul Woo Yang; Young-Lim Kim; Yeong Hoon Kim; Joong Kyung Kim; Chang-Kwon Oh; Su-Kil Park
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 1.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.