Literature DB >> 11260420

Graft surveillance: venous pressure, access flow, or the combination?

J H Smits1, J van der Linden, E C Hagen, E C Modderkolk-Cammeraat, G W Feith, H A Koomans, M A van den Dorpel, P J Blankestijn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased venous pressure (VP) and decreased access flow (Qa) are predictors of dialysis access graft thrombosis. VP is easily obtainable. Qa assessment requires a special device and takes more time. The aims of our randomized multicenter studies were to compare outcome in patients with grafts monitored by VP or Qa (study A) or monitored by VP or the combination of VP and Qa (study B).
METHODS: We performed VP measurements consisting of weekly VP at a pump flow of 200 mL/min (VP200) and the ratio of VP0/MAP. Qa was measured every eight weeks with the Transonic HD01 hemodialysis monitor. Threshold levels for referral for angiography were VP200> 150 mm Hg or VP0/MAP> 0.5 (both at 3 consecutive dialysis sessions) or Qa <600 mL/min. Subsequent therapy consisted of either percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or surgery.
RESULTS: Total follow-up was 80.5 patient-years for 125 grafts. The vast majority of a total of 131 positive tests was followed by angiography and corrective intervention. In study A, the rate of thromboses not preceded by a positive test was 0.19 and 0.24 per patient-year (P = NS), and in study B, it was 0.32 versus 0.28 per patient-year (P = NS). Survival curves were not significantly different between the subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that standardized monitoring of either VP or Qa or the combination of both and subsequent corrective intervention can reduce thrombosis rate in grafts to below the recommended quality of care standard (that is, 0.5 per patient-year, NKF-DOQI). These surveillance strategies are equally effective in reducing thrombosis rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11260420     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.0590041551.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  12 in total

Review 1.  Color Doppler ultrasound and arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis.

Authors:  Pasquale Zamboli; Fulvio Fiorini; Alessandro D'Amelio; Pasquale Fatuzzo; Antonio Granata
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 2.  Combined functional and anatomical diagnostic endpoints for assessing arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.

Authors:  Ehsan Rajabi-Jaghargh; Rupak K Banerjee
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials assessing hemodialysis access thrombosis based on access flow monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Timothy Muchayi; Loay Salman; Leonardo J Tamariz; Arif Asif; Abid Rizvi; Oliver Lenz; Roberto I Vazquez-Padron; Marwan Tabbara; Gabriel Contreras
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Optimizing function and treatment of hemodialysis grafts and fistulae.

Authors:  Thomas M Vesely
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  Surveillance of hemodialysis vascular access.

Authors:  William L Whittier
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Pre-emptive correction for haemodialysis arteriovenous access stenosis.

Authors:  Pietro Ravani; Robert R Quinn; Matthew J Oliver; Divya J Karsanji; Matthew T James; Jennifer M MacRae; Suetonia C Palmer; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-07

Review 7.  Hemodialysis vascular access monitoring: current concepts.

Authors:  Michael Allon; Michelle L Robbin
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.812

8.  Surveillance and monitoring of dialysis access.

Authors:  Lalathaksha Kumbar; Jariatul Karim; Anatole Besarab
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2011-11-22

9.  Arterial line pressure control enhanced extracorporeal blood flow prescription in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Franklin G Mora-Bravo; Alfonso Mariscal; Juan P Herrera-Felix; Salvador Magaña; Guadalupe De-La-Cruz; Nelly Flores; Laura Rosales; Martha Franco; Héctor Pérez-Grovas
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 10.  Comparison of ultrasound scan blood flow measurement versus other forms of surveillance in the thrombosis rate of hemodialysis access: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seun Deuk Hwang; Jin Ho Lee; Seoung Woo Lee; Joong Kyung Kim; Moon-Jae Kim; Joon Ho Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.