Literature DB >> 11259798

The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status.

J K Sluiter1, M H Frings-Dresen, A J van der Beek, T F Meijman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this cross-sectional study with repeated measurements was to find out to what extent neuroendocrine reactivity during work and neuroendocrine recovery from work, and work characteristics, are related to subjective need for recovery and perceived health status.
METHODS: Neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery were studied in 59 subjects by measuring urinary adrenaline and cortisol repeatedly during five consecutive days. Measures of work characteristics, subjective need for recovery, and health status were obtained by self-reports. Two hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: The work characteristics alone explained 39% and 28% of the variation in subjective need for recovery and health status, respectively, while these figures rose to 49% and 53% in the full models. Significant neuroendocrine contributors were found for cortisol in reactivity during work and recovery immediately after work and recovery during the day off-work, and for adrenaline in baseline level and recovery during the day off-work. Job characteristics contributed significantly as well.
CONCLUSION: Both neuroendocrine measures and work characteristics were predictors for the amount of perceived need for recovery after work as well as for health status. The results are consistent with the cognitive activation theory of stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11259798     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(00)00213-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  32 in total

1.  Fatigue as a risk factor for being injured in an occupational accident: results from the Maastricht Cohort Study.

Authors:  G M H Swaen; L G P M Van Amelsvoort; U Bültmann; I J Kant
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Need for recovery after work and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in a working population.

Authors:  L G P M van Amelsvoort; I J Kant; U Bültmann; G M H Swaen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Need for recovery from work related fatigue and its role in the development and prediction of subjective health complaints.

Authors:  J K Sluiter; E M de Croon; T F Meijman; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Measurement quality and validity of the "need for recovery scale".

Authors:  M van Veldhoven; S Broersen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Evaluation of top-down implementation of health regulations in the transport sector in a 5-year period.

Authors:  Merel Schuring; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Comparison between the first and second versions of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: psychosocial risk factors for a high need for recovery after work.

Authors:  Philippe Kiss; Marc De Meester; André Kruse; Brigitte Chavée; Lutgart Braeckman
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Stress monitoring of ambulance personnel during work and leisure time.

Authors:  Ulrika Aasa; Nebojsa Kalezic; Eugene Lyskov; Karl-Axel Angquist; Margareta Barnekow-Bergkvist
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  The relations between psychosocial factors at work and health status among workers in home care organizations.

Authors:  Hege R Eriksen; Camilla Ihlebaek; Jeroen P Jansen; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2006

9.  Psychometric properties of the Need for Recovery after work scale: test-retest reliability and sensitivity to detect change.

Authors:  E M de Croon; J K Sluiter; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Differences between younger and older workers in the need for recovery after work.

Authors:  Philippe Kiss; Marc De Meester; Lutgart Braeckman
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.