Literature DB >> 11259689

Longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic use in the hospital.

D Raveh1, Y Levy, Y Schlesinger, A Greenberg, B Rudensky, A M Yinnon.   

Abstract

We evaluated antimicrobial use in our hospital by department, including indications for use, source of infections, use of the microbiology laboratory, and appropriateness of prescribing, in a prospective, comparative, non-interventional study of all patients receiving antimicrobial agents. We excluded departments where antimicrobial use was negligible. The other 19 departments were followed for 3 (n=4) or 4 (n=15) months, including 2 consecutive months in the spring-summer and either 1 or 2 in the autumn-winter. Antimicrobial therapy was followed from initiation, through possible adaptations, and possible change from intravenous to oral therapy, until discontinuation of treatment. Overall, 6376 antibiotics were given to 2306 patients. Of the surveyed hospitalized patients, 62%+/-22% received antibiotics, with a range of 4-100% per department. Antibiotics were prescribed for infections acquired in the community (3037 instances, 47%), in the hospital (2182, 34%), in a nursing home (575, 9%), and for prophylaxis continued post-operatively (582, 9%). The most common indications for antimicrobial use were: respiratory tract infection (1729, 27%), urinary tract infection (955, 15%), sepsis (701, 11%), intra-abdominal infections (663, 10%), prophylaxis 582 (9%), soft-tissue infection (572, 9%), and surgical site infection (319, 5%). Univariate indicators for appropriateness of treatment were: age, department, site of infection, source of infection, antimicrobial drug and serum creatinine (all p<0.001). Forty-nine antimicrobials were prescribed in 279 combinations, 58% as single agent and 42% as drug combinations. Half of all antimicrobial use consisted of four agents: cefuroxime (19.1%), metronidazole (11.3%), gentamicin (10.6%) and ampicillin (10.2%), which together accounted for 20% of expenditure on antibiotics. Although use of as many as 53% of antimicrobials (26/49) surveyed was restricted, use in this category accounted for only 29% of all antimicrobial courses. Of 6376 antibiotic courses, 4101 (64%) were given intravenously and 2275 (36%) orally. Appropriateness of use of restricted drugs was lower (70%) than of unrestricted ones (84%, p<0.001). Of 24571 defined daily doses (DDD) given orally, 4587 (19%) were restricted, compared to 7264 (34%) of 21602 DDDs given intravenously (p<0.001). Antibiotic treatment in our hospital appears to be substantial and increasing, justifying efforts to improve appropriateness of therapy and improve clinical and financial results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11259689     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/94.3.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  16 in total

1.  A study of utilization of antimicrobial agents in patients on ventilator in intensive care unit (ICU) at tertiary care teaching hospital, India.

Authors:  Prakash R Shelat; Anuradha M Gandhi; Prakruti P Patel
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-11-20

2.  Prospective assessment of fluoroquinolone use in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  M Méan; P Pavese; J P Vittoz; L Foroni; C Decouchon; J P Stahl; P François
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Clinical and economic outcomes of pharmaceutical services related to antibiotic use: a literature review.

Authors:  Vera von Gunten; Jean-Philippe Reymond; Johnny Beney
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-02-02

4.  Different patterns of inappropriate antimicrobial use in surgical and medical units at a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland: a prevalence survey.

Authors:  Alexia Cusini; Silvana K Rampini; Vineeta Bansal; Bruno Ledergerber; Stefan P Kuster; Christian Ruef; Rainer Weber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  An assessment of antibiotics prescribed at the secondary health-care level in the Kyrgyz Republic.

Authors:  Kambaralieva Baktygul; Bozgunchiev Marat; Zurdinov Ashirali; Md Harun-Or-rashid; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.131

6.  Behaviour change interventions to influence antimicrobial prescribing: a cross-sectional analysis of reports from UK state-of-the-art scientific conferences.

Authors:  T M Rawson; L S P Moore; A M Tivey; A Tsao; M Gilchrist; E Charani; A H Holmes
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 4.887

7.  Antimicrobial use in paediatric patients in a teaching hospital in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Hafte Kahsay Kebede; Hailay Abrha Gesesew; Tewodros Eyob Woldehaimanot; Kabaye Kumela Goro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hospital-community interactions foster coexistence between methicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Roger Kouyos; Eili Klein; Bryan Grenfell
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Study of prescription of injectable drugs and intravenous fluids to inpatients in a teaching hospital in Western Nepal.

Authors:  Sudesh Gyawali; P Ravi Shankar; Archana Saha; Lalit Mohan
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2009-01

10.  Prescribing patterns of antibiotics and sensitivity patterns of common microorganisms in the Internal Medicine ward of a teaching hospital in Western Nepal: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ravi Pathiyil Shankar; Praveen Partha; Nagesh Kumar Shenoy; Joshy Maducolil Easow; Kottallur Narayanan Brahmadathan
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 3.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.