PURPOSE: We determined whether the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin hydrochloride would be enhanced by adding hydrogen peroxide as a source of oxygen free radicals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mouse bladder tumor cells (MBT-2) were grown in RPMI 1640 medium and treated with various concentrations of doxorubicin hydrochloride for 2 hours. Protein content was assayed as a measure of cell growth. A similar set of experiments was done with cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide only and combined doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide. Protein content was again assayed as a measure of cell growth. Cells were also assayed for glutathione peroxidase and malonyl dialdehyde, a product of lipid peroxidation, to determine the mechanism of cell damage. Furthermore, MBT-2 cells were incubated with 100 M. alpha-tocopherol, a free radical scavenger, before exposure to hydrogen peroxide to determine whether the effects of hydrogen peroxide could be reversed. RESULTS: We observed a dose dependent inhibition of MBT-2 cell growth after exposure to doxorubicin hydrochloride. Exposure to doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide resulted in greater cell growth inhibition than exposure to either agent alone. The effects of hydrogen peroxide on cell proliferation were reversed by pre-incubation with alpha-tocopherol. CONCLUSIONS: As a source of oxygen free radicals, hydrogen peroxide enhances the antiproliferative effect of doxorubicin hydrochloride on a mouse bladder tumor cell line. Thus, hydrogen peroxide may be a relatively inexpensive, nontoxic method of augmenting the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin hydrochloride. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these observations may have clinical application.
PURPOSE: We determined whether the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin hydrochloride would be enhanced by adding hydrogen peroxide as a source of oxygen free radicals. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Mousebladder tumor cells (MBT-2) were grown in RPMI 1640 medium and treated with various concentrations of doxorubicin hydrochloride for 2 hours. Protein content was assayed as a measure of cell growth. A similar set of experiments was done with cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide only and combined doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide. Protein content was again assayed as a measure of cell growth. Cells were also assayed for glutathione peroxidase and malonyl dialdehyde, a product of lipid peroxidation, to determine the mechanism of cell damage. Furthermore, MBT-2 cells were incubated with 100 M. alpha-tocopherol, a free radical scavenger, before exposure to hydrogen peroxide to determine whether the effects of hydrogen peroxide could be reversed. RESULTS: We observed a dose dependent inhibition of MBT-2 cell growth after exposure to doxorubicin hydrochloride. Exposure to doxorubicin and hydrogen peroxide resulted in greater cell growth inhibition than exposure to either agent alone. The effects of hydrogen peroxide on cell proliferation were reversed by pre-incubation with alpha-tocopherol. CONCLUSIONS: As a source of oxygen free radicals, hydrogen peroxide enhances the antiproliferative effect of doxorubicin hydrochloride on a mousebladder tumor cell line. Thus, hydrogen peroxide may be a relatively inexpensive, nontoxic method of augmenting the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin hydrochloride. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these observations may have clinical application.