Literature DB >> 11257657

Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: what is the most appropriate cut point?

C L Amling1, E J Bergstralh, M L Blute, J M Slezak, H Zincke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most appropriate definition of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy is uncertain. We analyzed the effect of using various prostate specific antigen (PSA) end point definitions for defining biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy and attempted to determine the best PSA cut point to use. Aspects of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of biochemical failure after radiation therapy are also analyzed in our radical prostatectomy cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,782 men with clinically localized prostate cancer (cT1-T2) who had undergone radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 1993 were reviewed. All patients had regular PSA determinations from surgery through followup. Analysis was limited to patients who did not receive adjuvant treatment within 90 days of radical prostatectomy. Biochemical, PSA progression-free percent after radical prostatectomy was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method using several PSA cut points, including 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ng./ml. or greater, as well as 0.4 ng./ml. or greater and increasing. Progression-free percent was also assessed using the ASTRO definition, which is 3 increases in PSA. To determine which PSA level was most appropriate to define progression after radical prostatectomy, the percentage of patients with a continued PSA increase after reaching each cut point was determined. The relationship between the maximum PSA within 3 years of surgery and subsequent development of clinical disease was also assessed.
RESULTS: Progression-free percent was dependent on the PSA cut point used. Biochemical progression-free percentages for cut points 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5 ng./ml. or greater were 62%, 72%, 76% and 78% at 5 years, and 43%, 54%, 59% and 61% at 10 years, respectively. A subsequent increase in PSA was noted in 49%, 62% and 72% of patients who had PSA 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 ng./ml., respectively. Subsequent clinical progression (local or systemic) was directly related to the maximum PSA attained within 3 years of radical prostatectomy (p=0.0001). Progression-free percent for definitions requiring multiple increases in PSA were dependent on when the event was said to occur. Backdating of events at or before the first PSA (ASTRO definition) resulted in poorer, short-term progression-free percent (78% at 5 years), with little apparent likelihood of long-term failure (78% at 10 years). Coding the event at the last PSA increase when all event criteria had been met resulted in more realistic progression-free percent estimates (85% at 5 and 59% at 10 years).
CONCLUSIONS: Biochemical, PSA progression rates vary markedly depending on the method used to define PSA failure. Methods that require multiple increasing PSA values, for example the ASTRO definition, give misleading results, especially if the event time is backdated. Standards for defining PSA progression would allow more consistent and comparable progression estimates after radical prostatectomy. PSA 0.4 ng./ml. or greater may be the most appropriate cut point to use since a significant number of patients with lower PSA do not have a continued increase in it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11257657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  78 in total

Review 1.  Can early implementation of salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer improve the therapeutic ratio? A systematic review and regression meta-analysis with radiobiological modelling.

Authors:  Nitin Ohri; Adam P Dicker; Edouard J Trabulsi; Timothy N Showalter
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Risk assessment for biochemical recurrence prior to radical prostatectomy: significant enhancement contributed by human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men with moderate PSA-elevation in serum.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Andrew J Vickers; Alexander Haese; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  54-year-old woman with clitoromegaly.

Authors:  Joseph A Veys; Ryan Payne; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

Review 4.  [Recurrence of prostate cancer--value of salvage radiotherapy].

Authors:  C Belka; U Ganswindt
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy--treat or watch?

Authors:  Dmitry Koulikov; Maura C Mohler; Diana C Mehedint; Kristopher Attwood; Gregory E Wilding; James L Mohler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Stefano Cirillo; Massimo Petracchini; Lorenza Scotti; Teresa Gallo; Annalisa Macera; Maria Cristina Bona; Cinzia Ortega; Pietro Gabriele; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Disseminated tumor cells in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy and without evidence of disease predicts biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Todd M Morgan; Paul H Lange; Michael P Porter; Daniel W Lin; William J Ellis; Ian S Gallaher; Robert L Vessella
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Definition of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy does not substantially impact prognostic factor estimates.

Authors:  Angel M Cronin; Guilherme Godoy; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PSA <0.5 ng/ml. Efficacy and impact on treatment strategy.

Authors:  Andrea Farolfi; Francesco Ceci; Paolo Castellucci; Tiziano Graziani; Giambattista Siepe; Alessandro Lambertini; Riccardo Schiavina; Filippo Lodi; Alessio G Morganti; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Impact of a family history of prostate cancer on clinicopathologic outcomes and survival following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mary E Westerman; Boris Gershman; R Jeffrey Karnes; R Houston Thompson; Laureano Rangel; Stephen A Boorjian
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.