Literature DB >> 11257652

Stage progression in Ta papillary urothelial tumors: relationship to grade, immunohistochemical expression of tumor markers, mitotic frequency and DNA ploidy.

S Holmäng1, P Andius, H Hedelin, K Wester, C Busch, S L Johansson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied 363 patients with stage Ta bladder tumors during long-term followup who were classified according to the 1998 WHO and International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classifications. We determine whether various immunohistochemical and molecular markers could predict tumor progression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 680 patients in western Sweden with a first diagnosis of bladder carcinoma in 1987 and 1988 were registered and followed for at least 5 years. There were 363 (53%) tumors that were papillary stage pTa. The tumors were classified as papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential in 95 patients, low grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in 160 and high grade carcinoma in 108. Of the patients in the latter group 95 were subdivided into WHO grade 2 and 13 into WHO grade 3. Tissue from the primary tumors that progressed in stage during followup was further analyzed with immunohistochemical methods (p21, p53, Ki67 and pRb), DNA ploidy and mitotic frequency. The results were compared with those in matched controls (nonprogressors).
RESULTS: Recurrence developed in 35% of patients with papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential compared to 71% with low grade urothelial carcinoma and 73% with high grade carcinoma (p <0.0001). No papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential progressed in stage. Disease progressed in 4% of patients with low grade compared to 23% with high grade carcinoma (p <0.0001). Of the patients with WHO grade 3 disease progressed in 45% compared to grade 2 in 20% (p <0.0011). At first diagnosis p53 score was significantly higher (p <0.0022) among patients with WHO grade 2 carcinoma which later progressed compared to that in matched controls but there was no significant difference regarding the other markers. In contrast to grade 2 most grade 3 carcinoma was aneuploid, had high mitosis frequency, high p53 and Ki67 scores as well as loss of retinoblastoma gene expression.
CONCLUSIONS: The 1988 WHO and International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classifications divide noninvasive papillary bladder tumors into 3 subgroups with different clinical behavior, which seems to be an advantage compared with the 1973 WHO classification. A disadvantage is that the high grade carcinoma group contains 2 subgroups with different progression rates and immunohistochemical marker profiles, corresponding to the 1999 WHO grades 2 and 3. Grade 2 tumors in patients that progressed in stage years later seem to have different immunohistochemical and molecular marker profiles compared to those in matched controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11257652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Histological grading of papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: prognostic value of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classification system and comparison with conventional grading systems.

Authors:  J W A Oosterhuis; R F M Schapers; M L G Janssen-Heijnen; R P E Pauwels; D W Newling; F ten Kate
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  R Montironi; A Lopez-Beltran; R Mazzucchelli; D G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  [Molecular markers in the diagnostics and therapy of urothelial cancer].

Authors:  C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Expectant Management of Low-Risk Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Zachary L Smith; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Histologic grading of urothelial papillary neoplasms: impact of combined grading (two-numbered grading system) on reproducibility.

Authors:  Burçin Tuna; Kutsal Yörükoglu; Ender Düzcan; Sait Sen; Nalan Nese; Banu Sarsık; Aysegul Akder; Sehnaz Sayhan; Uğur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Reduced immunohistochemical PTEN staining is associated with higher progression rate and recurrence episodes in non-invasive low-grade papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Ibrahim Kulac; Sehbal Arslankoz; George J Netto; Dilek Ertoy Baydar
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 7.  [Urinary bladder tumours. The new 2004 WHO classification].

Authors:  M Seitz; D Zaak; R Knüchel-Clarke; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Tumour Behaviour of Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Satya Dutta; Biswajit Dey; Vandana Raphael; Yookarin Khonglah; Jaya Mishra; Evarisalin Marbaniang; Pranjal Kalita; Stephen Sailo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 9.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Proliferation markers and DNA content analysis in urinary bladder TaT1 urothelial cell carcinomas: identification of subgroups with low and high stage progression risks.

Authors:  M G W Bol; J P A Baak; B van Diermen; S Buhr-Wildhagen; E A M Janssen; K H Kjellevold; A J Kruse; O Mestad; P Øgreid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.