Literature DB >> 11257206

Molecular diagnosis of Lyme disease: review and meta-analysis.

J S Dumler1.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of Lyme disease is difficult because tests that reflect active disease or have reasonable sensitivity and specificity are lacking or not timely. Molecular methods are controversial because of differences in assays, gene targets, and limited clinical validation. This review summarizes published assays for Lyme disease diagnosis using skin, plasma, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and urine. Meta-analyses show the strengths and weaknesses of these methods. Overall, assays for skin and synovial fluid (68% and 73%, respectively) have high sensitivity and uniformity. The low test sensitivity of CSF (18%) and plasma (29%), variable sensitivities among CSF and urine assays, and persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi DNA in urine and synovial fluid even with therapy and convalescence make these unsuitable for primary diagnosis. Molecular assays for Lyme disease are best used with other diagnostic methods and only in situations in which the clinical probability of Lyme disease is high.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11257206     DOI: 10.1054/modi.2001.21898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1084-8592


  20 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory testing for Lyme disease: possibilities and practicalities.

Authors:  Kurt D Reed
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A 35-year-old man with a positive Lyme test result from a private laboratory.

Authors:  Nisha Andany; Savannah Cardew; Paul E Bunce
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Two-year evaluation of Borrelia burgdorferi culture and supplemental tests for definitive diagnosis of Lyme disease.

Authors:  Peggy Coulter; Clara Lema; Diane Flayhart; Amy S Linhardt; John N Aucott; Paul G Auwaerter; J Stephen Dumler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Critical evaluation of urine-based PCR assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Carolin Rauter; Markus Mueller; Isabel Diterich; Sabine Zeller; Dieter Hassler; Thomas Meergans; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2005-08

5.  Antiscience and ethical concerns associated with advocacy of Lyme disease.

Authors:  Paul G Auwaerter; Johan S Bakken; Raymond J Dattwyler; J Stephen Dumler; John J Halperin; Edward McSweegan; Robert B Nadelman; Susan O'Connell; Eugene D Shapiro; Sunil K Sood; Allen C Steere; Arthur Weinstein; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 6.  Diagnosis of lyme borreliosis.

Authors:  Maria E Aguero-Rosenfeld; Guiqing Wang; Ira Schwartz; Gary P Wormser
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Lyme neuroborreliosis-epidemiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Uwe Koedel; Volker Fingerle; Hans-Walter Pfister
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Laboratory diagnostics for Lyme disease.

Authors:  L R Lindsay; K Bernat; A Dibernardo
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2014-05-29

Review 9.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis.

Authors:  John A Branda; Allen C Steere
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Improved culture conditions for the growth and detection of Borrelia from human serum.

Authors:  Eva Sapi; Namrata Pabbati; Akshita Datar; Ellen M Davies; Amy Rattelle; Bruce A Kuo
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.