OBJECTIVE: This prospective and randomized clinical study was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of combined androgen blockade with combination with UFT in patients with untreated prostate cancer. METHODS:A total of 142 patients were entered in this study between April 1990 and December 1992. All patients received bilateral orchiectomy and 200 mg/day of diethylstilbestrol diphosphate. Of these patients, 70 patients were administered an additional 400 mg/day of UFT after randomization. Either treatment was continued for at least 1 year or until objective progression occurred if the initial response was equal to or better than no change. The endpoints of this study were progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival and change of QOL scores. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were evaluable and 131 patients (96.3%) could be followed up with a median follow-up period of 1469 days. Both groups showed similar initial treatment response at 12 weeks, adverse effect and change of quality of life score during the first year after initiation of the treatment. There was a significantly longer progression-free survival and better but not significant cancer-specific survival in the endocrine chemotherapy group. The patients with earlier stage and initial serum prostate-specific antigen values <40 ng/ml showed a good indication for this endocrine chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This endocrine chemotherapy was confirmed to be tolerable and significantly effective in the delay of disease progression, which leads to longer survival in patients with prostate cancer.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This prospective and randomized clinical study was initiated to compare the efficacy and safety of combined androgen blockade with combination with UFT in patients with untreated prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 142 patients were entered in this study between April 1990 and December 1992. All patients received bilateral orchiectomy and 200 mg/day of diethylstilbestrol diphosphate. Of these patients, 70 patients were administered an additional 400 mg/day of UFT after randomization. Either treatment was continued for at least 1 year or until objective progression occurred if the initial response was equal to or better than no change. The endpoints of this study were progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival and change of QOL scores. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients were evaluable and 131 patients (96.3%) could be followed up with a median follow-up period of 1469 days. Both groups showed similar initial treatment response at 12 weeks, adverse effect and change of quality of life score during the first year after initiation of the treatment. There was a significantly longer progression-free survival and better but not significant cancer-specific survival in the endocrine chemotherapy group. The patients with earlier stage and initial serum prostate-specific antigen values <40 ng/ml showed a good indication for this endocrine chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This endocrine chemotherapy was confirmed to be tolerable and significantly effective in the delay of disease progression, which leads to longer survival in patients with prostate cancer.