Literature DB >> 11255054

Clinical results of phacoemulsification with the use of Healon5 or Viscoat.

M R Tetz1, M P Holzer, K Lundberg, G U Auffarth, R O Burk, F E Kruse.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the ophthalmic viscosurgical devices Healon5 (viscoadaptive) and Viscoat (dispersive) regarding their overall clinical performance during phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation as well as their influence on intraocular pressure (IOP).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
METHODS: In this prospective randomized patient- and observer-masked clinical study, the performance of Healon5 (sodium hyaluronate 2.3%) and Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%-chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) was assessed by 3 surgeons during cataract surgery in 90 patients. Surgeons used a 5-point scale for the subjective assessment of the ease of injection, maintenance capacity during continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, remaining capacity during phacoemulsification, facilitation of IOL implantation, removal from the eye, transparency, and overall performance throughout surgery. Intraocular pressure was measured preoperatively and 24 hours and 7 days postoperatively. Best corrected visual acuity was assessed preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively.
RESULTS: Overall intraoperative product performance was assessed as good or very good in 34 of 44 patients (77%) in the Healon5 group and in 16 of 46 patients (35%) in the Viscoat group (P <.001). Retention in the anterior chamber was graded good or very good in 36 patients (82%) in the Healon5 group and in 23 (50%) in the Viscoat group (P =.001). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in mean IOP preoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons graded Healon5 better than Viscoat in overall surgical performance and retention in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. These data support that Healon5 adapts to each step during surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11255054     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00569-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

1.  Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes.

Authors:  T Oshika; F Okamoto; Y Kaji; T Hiraoka; T Kiuchi; M Sato; K Kawana
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A clinical comparison between DisCoVisc and 2% hydroxypropylmethylcellulose in phacoemulsification: a fellow eye study.

Authors:  Rodrigo F Espíndola; Emerson F S Castro; Marcony R Santhiago; Newton Kara-Junior
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Viscoat versus Visthesia during phacoemulsification cataract surgery: corneal and foveal changes.

Authors:  Marilita M Moschos; Irini P Chatziralli; Theodoros N Sergentanis
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Prefilled syringes and usability of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices.

Authors:  Takuya Shiba; Hiroshi Tsuneoka
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-04

5.  A new histological evaluation method to detect residual ophthalmic viscosurgical devices for cataract surgery.

Authors:  Hidetsugu Mori; Haruhiko Yamada; Keiko Toyama; Kanji Takahashi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-09-26

6.  Thickness of the Protective Layers of Different Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Devices During Lens Surgery in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Melanie Wüst; Philipp Matten; Magdalena Nenning; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.