Literature DB >> 11254989

The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation.

Z Tang-Martinez1.   

Abstract

I re-examine the four most widely proposed mechanisms of kin discrimination among vertebrates and conclude that the current categorization of kin discrimination mechanisms has been counterproductive because it has a hindered a clear understanding of the basic mechanisms by which animals discriminate kin. I suggest that there likely is only one authentic mechanism of kin discrimination and that this mechanism is learning, particularly associative learning and habituation. Observed differences in the way animals discriminate between kin and non-kin are due only to the cues (e.g., individually-distinctive, family-distinctive, or self) that are used, and not to different mechanisms per se. I also consider whether kin discrimination is mediated by specially evolved kin recognition systems, defined as neural mechanisms that allow animals to directly classify conspecifics as either kin or non-kin. A preliminary analysis of vertebrate recognition systems suggests that specialized neural, endocrine, and developmental mechanisms specifically for recognizing kin have not evolved. Rather, kin discrimination results from an extension of other, non-specialized sensory and cognitive abilities of animals, and may be derived from other forms of social recognition, such as individual, group, or species recognition.

Year:  2001        PMID: 11254989     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00148-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  29 in total

1.  Wild female baboons bias their social behaviour towards paternal half-sisters.

Authors:  Kerri Smith; Susan C Alberts; Jeanne Altmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Preferences of newborn mice for odours indicating closer genetic relatedness: is experience necessary?

Authors:  Josephine Todrank; Nicolas Busquet; Claude Baudoin; Giora Heth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Inbreeding load and inbreeding depression estimated from lifetime reproductive success in a small, dispersal-limited population.

Authors:  Janna R Willoughby; Peter M Waser; Anna Brüniche-Olsen; Mark R Christie
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Female major histocompatibility complex type affects male testosterone levels and sperm number in the horse (Equus caballus).

Authors:  D Burger; G Dolivo; E Marti; H Sieme; C Wedekind
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Monkeys spontaneously discriminate their unfamiliar paternal kin under natural conditions using facial cues.

Authors:  Dana Pfefferle; Anahita J N Kazem; Ralf R Brockhausen; Angelina V Ruiz-Lambides; Anja Widdig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Helping decisions and kin recognition in long-tailed tits: is call similarity used to direct help towards kin?

Authors:  Amy E Leedale; Robert F Lachlan; Elva J H Robinson; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Odour-based kin discrimination in the cooperatively breeding meerkat.

Authors:  Sarah Leclaire; Johanna F Nielsen; Nathan K Thavarajah; Marta Manser; Tim H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Does kin recognition and sib-mating avoidance limit the risk of genetic incompatibility in a parasitic wasp?

Authors:  Marie Metzger; Carlos Bernstein; Thomas S Hoffmeister; Emmanuel Desouhant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Male hamsters discriminate estrous state from vaginal secretions and individuals from flank marks.

Authors:  Javier delBarco-Trillo; Alex B LaVenture; Robert E Johnston
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Entamoeba Clone-Recognition Experiments: Morphometrics, Aggregative Behavior, and Cell-Signaling Characterization.

Authors:  Avelina Espinosa; Guillermo Paz-Y-Miño-C; Meagan Hackey; Scott Rutherford
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.