Literature DB >> 11253589

An exploratory study of clinical decision-making in five countries.

S Lauri1, S Salanterä, K Chalmers, S L Ekman, H S Kim, S Käppeli, M MacLeod.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the cognitive processes nurses use in their decision-making in long- and short-term care settings in five countries, and the demographic variables associated with their decision-making. METHOD AND SAMPLES: The instrument used was a 56-item questionnaire that has been shown to be reliable in earlier studies. The sample consisted of five convenience samples of registered nurses working in either geriatric wards (n = 236) or acute medical-surgical wards (n = 223) in hospitals or nursing homes in Canada, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States.
FINDINGS: Five models of decision-making were identified on the basis of factor analysis. They represent both analytical and intuitive cognitive processes. Analytical cognitive processes were emphasized in information collection, problem definition, and planning of care, and intuitive cognitive processes were emphasized in planning, implementing, and evaluating care. Professional education, practical experience, field of practice, and type of knowledge were significantly associated with decision-making models as well as with country of residence of the participants. The highest proportion of analytically oriented decision-makers was found among nurses in long-term care, the decision-making of nurses in short-term care was more intuitively oriented.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that decision-making of participants varied from country to country and in different nursing situations. Future research should be focused on reasons for these differences, the relationship between the task and the nurses' type of knowledge, and how nurses use their knowledge to make decisions in different nursing situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11253589     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00083.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh        ISSN: 1527-6546            Impact factor:   3.176


  7 in total

1.  Evaluating Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning in Psychiatry Using Clinical and Basic Science Concepts Presented in Session-level Integration Sessions.

Authors:  Dan I Blunk; Silvina Tonarelli; Claire Gardner; Dale Quest; Diana Petitt; Marie Leiner
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Clinical decision making of nurses working in hospital settings.

Authors:  Ida Torunn Bjørk; Glenys A Hamilton
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2011-09-28

3.  Nurses' actions in response to nursing assistants' observations of signs and symptoms of infections among nursing home residents.

Authors:  Hanna Allemann; Märta Sund-Levander
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2015-08-06

4.  The Influence of Self-Concept on Clinical Decision-Making in Nurses and Nursing Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Nikolina Farčić; Ivana Barać; Robert Lovrić; Stana Pačarić; Zvjezdana Gvozdanović; Vesna Ilakovac
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Personality traits of core self-evaluation as predictors on clinical decision-making in nursing profession.

Authors:  Nikolina Farčić; Ivana Barać; Jadranka Plužarić; Vesna Ilakovac; Stana Pačarić; Zvjezdana Gvozdanović; Robert Lovrić
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Beyond competencies - describing work ready plus graduates for the New Zealand medical imaging workforce.

Authors:  Dale Sheehan; Tracy M de Bueger; Joanna Thorogood; Sharon Sitters; Arun Deo
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-07-01

7.  A Concept Analysis of Nurses' Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea.

Authors:  Sunyoung Oh; Minkyung Gu; Sohyune Sok
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.