Literature DB >> 11252710

Gender verification of female athletes.

L J Elsas1, A Ljungqvist, M A Ferguson-Smith, J L Simpson, M Genel, A S Carlson, E Ferris, A de la Chapelle, A A Ehrhardt.   

Abstract

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) officially mandated gender verification for female athletes beginning in 1968 and continuing through 1998. The rationale was to prevent masquerading males and women with "unfair, male-like" physical advantage from competing in female-only events. Visual observation and gynecological examination had been tried on a trial basis for two years at some competitions leading up to the 1968 Olympic Games, but these invasive and demeaning processes were jettisoned in favor of laboratory-based genetic tests. Sex chromatin and more recently DNA analyses for Y-specific male material were then required of all female athletes immediately preceding IOC-sanctioned sporting events, and many other international and national competitions following the IOC model. On-site gender verification has since been found to be highly discriminatory, and the cause of emotional trauma and social stigmatization for many females with problems of intersex who have been screened out from competition. Despite compelling evidence for the lack of scientific merit for chromosome-based screening for gender, as well as its functional and ethical inconsistencies, the IOC persisted in its policy for 30 years. The coauthors of this manuscript have worked with some success to rescind this policy through educating athletes and sports governors regarding the psychological and physical nature of sexual differentiation, and the inequities of genetic sex testing. In 1990, the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF) called for abandonment of required genetic screening of women athletes, and by 1992 had adopted a fairer, medically justifiable model for preventing only male "impostors" in international track and field. At the recent recommendation of the IOC Athletes Commission, the Executive Board of the IOC has finally recognized the medical and functional inconsistencies and undue costs of chromosome-based methods. In 1999, the IOC ratified the abandonment of on-site genetic screening of females at the next Olympic Games in Australia. This article reviews the history and rationales for fairness in female-only sports that have led to the rise and fall of on-site, chromosome-based gender verification at international sporting events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11252710     DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200007000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  11 in total

1.  Reproductive endocrinology: athletes' bodies, sexed bodies--intersexuality in athletics.

Authors:  Eric Vilain; Francisco J Sánchez
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Gender verification: a term whose time has come and gone.

Authors:  Laura Hercher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Do anabolic-androgenic steroids have performance-enhancing effects in female athletes?

Authors:  Grace Huang; Shehzad Basaria
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 4.  Towards improved genetic diagnosis of human differences of sex development.

Authors:  Emmanuèle C Délot; Eric Vilain
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Intersex and the Olympic Games.

Authors:  Robert Ritchie; John Reynard; Tom Lewis
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Natural selection for genetic variants in sport: the role of Y chromosome genes in elite female athletes with 46,XY DSD.

Authors:  Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; L Dawn Bavington
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Out of bounds? A critique of the new policies on hyperandrogenism in elite female athletes.

Authors:  Katrina Karkazis; Rebecca Jordan-Young; Georgiann Davis; Silvia Camporesi
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  How is the Topic of Intersex Athletes in Elite Sports Positioned in Academic Literature Between January 2000 and July 2022? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marisa Jensen; Jörg Schorer; Irene R Faber
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-10-20

9.  Sex and gender issues in competitive sports: investigation of a historical case leads to a new viewpoint.

Authors:  Kaye N Ballantyne; Manfred Kayser; J Anton Grootegoed
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Genes, Gender, Hormones, and Doping in Sport: A Convoluted Tale.

Authors:  Alan D Rogol; Lindsay Parks Pieper
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.