Literature DB >> 11252342

Continuous infusion ceftazidime in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial.

J Lipman1, C D Gomersall, T Gin, G M Joynt, R J Young.   

Abstract

We randomized 18 critically ill patients to receive ceftazidime 6 g/day by continuous infusion or bolus dosing (2 g 8 hourly), each with a loading dose of 12 mg/kg ceftazidime. During the first 8 h, plasma ceftazidime concentration fell below 40 mg/L in only one patient (trough 38 mg/L) from the infusion group, compared with eight from the bolus group (2-33 mg/L) for periods ranging from 73 to 369 min. Thereafter all infusion patients remained above 40 mg/L for 40 h of study versus 20-30% of bolus patients. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of ceftazidime suggest that continuous infusions should be clinically investigated in outcome studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11252342     DOI: 10.1093/jac/43.2.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  28 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of ceftazidime continuous infusion vs intermittent bolus injection in septicaemic melioidosis.

Authors:  B J Angus; M D Smith; Y Suputtamongkol; H Mattie; A L Walsh; V Wuthiekanun; W Chaowagul; N J White
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in healthy volunteers--implications for optimal dosage regimens.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Martina Kinzig; Verena Jakob; Ulrike Holzgrabe; Fritz Sörgel; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Continuous vs. intermittent cefotaxime administration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory tract infections: pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, bacterial susceptibility and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  A R H van Zanten; M Oudijk; M K E Nohlmans-Paulssen; Y G van der Meer; A R J Girbes; K H Polderman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 3-hour infusion or bolus injection.

Authors:  Sutep Jaruratanasirikul; Somchai Sriwiriyajan; Jarurat Punyo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  A long journey from minimum inhibitory concentration testing to clinically predictive breakpoints: deterministic and probabilistic approaches in deriving breakpoints.

Authors:  A Dalhoff; P G Ambrose; J W Mouton
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 8.  Continuous versus intermittent intravenous administration of antibacterials with time-dependent action: a systematic review of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Sofia K Kasiakou; Kenneth R Lawrence; Nicolaos Choulis; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Comparative stability studies of antipseudomonal beta-lactams for potential administration through portable elastomeric pumps (home therapy for cystic fibrosis patients) and motor-operated syringes (intensive care units).

Authors:  Eric Viaene; Hugues Chanteux; Hélène Servais; Marie-Paule Mingeot-Leclercq; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Insufficient β-lactam concentrations in the early phase of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Pierre-François Laterre; Thierry Dugernier; Herbert Spapen; Isabelle Delattre; Xavier Wittebole; Daniel De Backer; Brice Layeux; Pierre Wallemacq; Jean-Louis Vincent; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.