Literature DB >> 11252009

Heterogeneity in phase I clinical trials: prior elicitation and computation using the continual reassessment method.

A T Legedza1, J G Ibrahim.   

Abstract

Heterogeneity in a phase I clinical trial patient population may lead to distinctly different dose-response relationships along covariate values. For a given target probability of toxicity, this implies different maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) for each distinct subpopulation. Within the framework of O'Quigley, Pepe and Fisher's (1990) continual reassessment method, we propose the notion of average and patient-specific MTDs by augmenting the dose--response model with other covariates to account for such differences. A method to elicit prior distributions on the dose and other covariate parameters are proposed, based on the predictive approach of Ibrahim and Laud (1994), Laud and Ibrahim (1995), and Ibrahim, Ryan and Chen (1998). This approach relies on prior predictions for the response vector y(0) and a quantity a(0) specifying uncertainty in y(0). Then, y(0) and a(0) are used to specify a prior for the regression coefficients in a semi-automatic fashion. The elicitation scheme for y(0) uses results from previous phase I cancer clinical trials. The average and patient-specific MTDs and an elicitation method are demonstrated in logistic regression examples. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11252009     DOI: 10.1002/sim.701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Isotonic designs for phase I trials in partially ordered groups.

Authors:  Mark Conaway
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  CRM2DIM: A SAS macro for implementing the dual-agent Bayesian continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Mohamed Amine Bayar; Anastasia Ivanova; Gwénaël Le Teuff
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Paul W Read; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  The Impact of Early-Phase Trial Design in the Drug Development Process.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  A design for phase I trials in completely or partially ordered groups.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Designs for phase I trials in ordered groups.

Authors:  Mark R Conaway; Nolan A Wages
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Risk-group-specific dose finding based on an average toxicity score.

Authors:  B Nebiyou Bekele; Yisheng Li; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Adaptive designs for dual-agent phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harrington; Graham M Wheeler; Michael J Sweeting; Adrian P Mander; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Graham M Wheeler; Adrian P Mander; Alun Bedding; Kristian Brock; Victoria Cornelius; Andrew P Grieve; Thomas Jaki; Sharon B Love; Lang'o Odondi; Christopher J Weir; Christina Yap; Simon J Bond
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Prior Elicitation for Use in Clinical Trial Design and Analysis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Danila Azzolina; Paola Berchialla; Dario Gregori; Ileana Baldi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.