Literature DB >> 11251681

What attracts patients with diabetes to an internet support group? A 21-month longitudinal website study.

J F Zrebiec1, A M Jacobson.   

Abstract

AIMS: To establish and evaluate a web-based educational and emotional resource for patients with diabetes and their family members.
METHODS: A total of 47 365 user visits over a 21-month period to three internet discussion groups about diabetes were tracked for user activity, characteristics and level of satisfaction.
RESULTS: The primary domains of users were the US (70%) and Canada (4%). Of all users, 7.55% posted messages, while 92.45% read messages posted by others. The average length of use was 15 min 5 s. Forty-four per cent posted messages to the nutrition discussion, 38% posted messages to the motivational discussion, and 18% posted messages to the family discussion. The most common postings addressed nutrition (42%), the emotional impact of diabetes (18%), managing high or low blood glucose levels (10%), and complications (8%). Respondents to the satisfaction survey were 64% female, 43% were insulin and 37% non-insulin users. Eighty-four per cent were older than 30 years, 34% had recently diagnosed diabetes and 32% had diabetes > 10 years. Forty-three per cent visited more than three times. Seventy-nine per cent of all respondents rated participation in the chat as having a positive effect on coping with diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: A professionally moderated internet discussion group is actively visited by a broad base of patients and families, and appears to be a useful strategy for engaging patients with chronic disease for emotional support and information exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11251681     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  28 in total

1.  Professional internet information source used as educational resource for patients with insulin-treated diabetes in the Czech Republic: a 5-year analysis of operations.

Authors:  Jan Brož; Marek Brabec; Klára Brožová; Ivana Cibulková; Denisa Janíčková Žďárská; Daniela Hartmann
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Internet use among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: the generation and education gap.

Authors:  Richard W Grant; Enrico Cagliero; Henry C Chueh; James B Meigs
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Ecological approaches to self-management: the case of diabetes.

Authors:  Edwin B Fisher; Carol A Brownson; Mary L O'Toole; Gowri Shetty; Victoria V Anwuri; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Enhancing support via interactive technologies.

Authors:  John D Piette
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Attitudes about internet support groups among adolescents and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 and their parents.

Authors:  Staci Martin; Pamela L Wolters; Andrea Baldwin; Marie Claire Roderick; Mary Anne Toledo-Tamula; Andrea Gillespie; Brigitte Widemann
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  A virtual clinic for diabetes self-management: pilot study.

Authors:  Amy Jennings; John Powell; Natalie Armstrong; Jackie Sturt; Jeremy Dale
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Content and frequency of writing on diabetes bulletin boards: does race make a difference?

Authors:  Siobhan Case; Valarie Jernigan; Audra Gardner; Philip Ritter; Catherine A Heaney; Kate R Lorig
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  A review of web-assisted interventions for diabetes management: maximizing the potential for improving health outcomes.

Authors:  Linda Lockett Brown; Mia Liza A Lustria; Jenice Rankins
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-11

9.  Patient perspectives on health advice posted on Internet discussion boards: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Natalie Armstrong; John Powell
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Marshalling Social Support: A "Care-Getting" Model for Persons Living with Cancer.

Authors:  Eva Kahana; Boaz Kahana; May Wykle; Diana Kulle
Journal:  J Fam Soc Work       Date:  2009-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.