Literature DB >> 11251665

Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe.

P Eickholz1, F L Grotkamp, H Steveling, J Mühling, H J Staehle.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of probing depth (PD) and vertical attachment level (PAL-V) measurements at endosseous implants. Twenty partially edentulous patients who had received 44 Frialit-2 and 30 Astra implants between 1994 and 1996 were examined. At all teeth and implants, clinical parameters (GI, PlI, PD, PAL-V) were measured at 6 sites using the flexible plastic version of the universal explorer TPS probe. At the implants and at teeth that were in similar locations compared to the implants, PD and PAL-V measurements were repeated. For each of the 20 probes that had been used for clinical examination of the 20 patients, the probing force was assessed using a precision balance. As a measure of intraexaminer reproducibility, the following standard deviations of single PD and PAL-V measurements were calculated: Frialit-2: 0.71/0.74 mm; Astra: 0.72/0.75 mm; tooth: 0.59/0.57 mm (PD/PAL-V). Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed implant/tooth position and GI to influence PD and PAL-V measurement error (P<0.001). At anterior teeth, a lower variability was observed than at posterior teeth (P<0.001). PD and PAL-V measurement error were higher at implants than at teeth and influenced by patients. The respective models explained 13% and 17% of the variability of the dependent variable (PD/PAL-V), respectively. Intraexaminer variability of PD and PAL-V measurements at implants tended to be higher than at teeth. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed probe and probe holder to statistically significantly (P<0.001) influence probing force. However, the differences in probing force between the various probe heads were very small. They reached a maximum of 0.054 N between probe 3 and 14 and may be looked upon as clinically irrelevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11251665     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002153.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  3 in total

1.  How Intraday Index Changes Influence Periodontal Assessment: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Carlo Bertoldi; Andrea Forabosco; Michele Lalla; Luigi Generali; Davide Zaffe; Pierpaolo Cortellini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-07-30

2.  Volumetric Analysis of Gingival Crevicular Fluid and Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid in Healthy and Diseased Sites: A Cross-Sectional Split-Mouth Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Bevilacqua; Matteo De Biasi; Maria Giulia Lorenzon; Costanza Frattini; Daniele Angerame
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2016-04-30

Review 3.  How do peri-implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri-implantitis? A critical review.

Authors:  Ron Doornewaard; Wolfgang Jacquet; Jan Cosyn; Hugo De Bruyn
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.977

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.