Literature DB >> 11251497

Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial.

M A Biró1, U Waldenström, J H Pannifex.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1996 a new model of maternity care characterized by continuity of midwifery care from early pregnancy through to the postpartum period was implemented for women attending Monash Medical Centre, a tertiary level obstetric service, in Melbourne, Australia. The objective of this study was to compare the new model of care with standard maternity care.
METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, 1000 women who booked at the antenatal clinic and met the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to receive continuity of midwifery care (team care) from a group of seven midwives in collaboration with obstetric staff, or care from a variety of midwives and obstetric staff (standard care). The primary outcome measures were procedures in labor, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Women assigned to the team care group experienced less augmentation of labor, less electronic fetal monitoring, less use of narcotic and epidural analgesia, and fewer episiotomies but more unsutured tears. Team care women stayed in hospital 7 hours less than women in standard care. More babies of standard care mothers were admitted to the special care nurseries for more than 5 days because of preterm birth, and more babies of team care mothers were admitted to the nurseries for more than 5 days with intrauterine growth retardation. No differences occurred in perinatal mortality between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Continuity of midwifery care was associated with a reduction in medical procedures in labor and a shorter length of stay without compromising maternal and perinatal safety. Continuity of midwifery care is realistically achievable in a tertiary obstetric referral service.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11251497     DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00168.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  13 in total

Review 1.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Gp Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Trends in very early discharge from hospital for newborns under midwifery care in Ontario from 2003 to 2017: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Elizabeth K Darling; Glenda Babe; Carla Sorbara; Richard Perez
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-06-25

Review 3.  Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Guillermo Carroli; Lelia Duley; Simon Gates; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Dina Khan-Neelofur; Gilda Piaggio
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

4.  Social inequalities in the organization of pregnancy care in a universally funded public health care system.

Authors:  Georgina Sutherland; Jane Yelland; Stephanie Brown
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-02

5.  A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Jessica Tone; Sutapa Talukdar; Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Hospital nurse-staffing models and patient- and staff-related outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle Butler; Timothy J Schultz; Phil Halligan; Ann Sheridan; Leigh Kinsman; Thomas Rotter; Jonathan Beaumier; Robyn Gail Kelly; Jonathan Drennan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-23

7.  Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Jane Yelland; Jo Rayner; Judith Lumley; Mary-Ann Davey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Models of antenatal care to reduce and prevent preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Fernandez Turienzo; Jane Sandall; Janet L Peacock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 9.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

10.  From little things, big things grow: a local approach to system-wide maternity services reform in the absence of definitive evidence.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Boxall; Kathy Flitcroft
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.