Literature DB >> 11250810

Methods to identify and characterize developmental neurotoxicity for human health risk assessment. III: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations.

D C Dorman1, S L Allen, J Z Byczkowski, L Claudio, J E Fisher, J W Fisher, G J Harry, A A Li, S L Makris, S Padilla, L G Sultatos, B E Mileson.   

Abstract

We review pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors that should be considered in the design and interpretation of developmental neurotoxicity studies. Toxicologic effects on the developing nervous system depend on the delivered dose, exposure duration, and developmental stage at which exposure occurred. Several pharmacokinetic processes (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) govern chemical disposition within the dam and the nervous system of the offspring. In addition, unique physical features such as the presence or absence of a placental barrier and the gradual development of the blood--brain barrier influence chemical disposition and thus modulate developmental neurotoxicity. Neonatal exposure may depend on maternal pharmacokinetic processes and transfer of the xenobiotic through the milk, although direct exposure may occur through other routes (e.g., inhalation). Measurement of the xenobiotic in milk and evaluation of biomarkers of exposure or effect following exposure can confirm or characterize neonatal exposure. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models that incorporate these and other determinants can estimate tissue dose and biologic response following in utero or neonatal exposure. These models can characterize dose--response relationships and improve extrapolation of results from animal studies to humans. In addition, pharmacologic data allow an experimenter to determine whether exposure to the test chemical is adequate, whether exposure occurs during critical periods of nervous system development, whether route and duration of exposure are appropriate, and whether developmental neurotoxicity can be differentiated from direct actions of the xenobiotic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11250810      PMCID: PMC1240547          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109s1101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  159 in total

1.  Correlating pharmacokinetics and teratogenic endpoints.

Authors:  C A Kimmel; J F Young
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Placental drug transfer: effects of gestational age and species.

Authors:  G W Mihaly; D J Morgan
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 3.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: principles and applications.

Authors:  L E Gerlowski; R K Jain
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Relationship between lipophilicity and brain extraction of C-11-labeled radiopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  D D Dishino; M J Welch; M R Kilbourn; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Plasma protein binding of drugs in pregnancy.

Authors:  E Perucca; A Crema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Placental toxicology.

Authors:  D R Goodman; R C James; R D Harbison
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 6.023

7.  Endogenous metal binding proteins in relation to the differences in absorption and distribution of mercury in newborn and adult rats.

Authors:  M Webb; D Holt
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Hepatic microsomal drug metabolism in the pregnant rat.

Authors:  A M Symons; R G Turcan; D V Parke
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 1.908

9.  Effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of phenytoin in rats.

Authors:  R C Chou; G Levy
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Transfer of bupivacaine, lignocaine and pethidine across the rabbit placenta: influence of maternal protein binding and fetal flow.

Authors:  A Hamshaw-Thomas; N Rogerson; F Reynolds
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  6 in total

1.  High-content imaging of 3D-cultured neural stem cells on a 384-pillar plate for the assessment of cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Pranav Joshi; Soo-Yeon Kang; Kyeong-Nam Yu; Chandrasekhar Kothapalli; Moo-Yeal Lee
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.500

2.  Lactational state modifies alcohol pharmacokinetics in women.

Authors:  Marta Yanina Pepino; Allison L Steinmeyer; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Lactational exposure to abamectin induced mortality and adverse biochemical and histopathological effects in suckling pups.

Authors:  Abdel-Tawab H Mossa; Mona A Abdel Rasoul; Samia M M Mohafrash
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Introduction: reviews of environmental health, 2001.

Authors:  T J Goehl
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  The Effects of Environmental Adversities on Human Neocortical Neurogenesis Modeled in Brain Organoids.

Authors:  Kseniia Sarieva; Simone Mayer
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-06-24

Review 6.  A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426.

Authors:  Susan L Makris; Kathleen Raffaele; Sandra Allen; Wayne J Bowers; Ulla Hass; Enrico Alleva; Gemma Calamandrei; Larry Sheets; Patric Amcoff; Nathalie Delrue; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.