Literature DB >> 11249173

Effect of rhythm and level of distraction on muscle structure: an animal study.

M R Makarov1, L N Kochutina, M L Samchukov, J G Birch, R D Welch.   

Abstract

To determine the optimal rhythm of distraction and level of osteotomy for maximal muscle preservation during limb lengthening, histologic and ultrastructural analysis of the peroneus tertius muscle was performed in 46 goats. Thirty-nine animals with 20% or 30% tibial lengthening at the rate of 0.75 mm per day at each osteotomy level were divided in two groups. The first group included 15 animals undergoing tibial middiaphyseal lengthening with automated distractor producing one (n = 5), four (n = 5), or 720 (n = 5) increments per day. The second group included 24 animals in which lengthening was performed at the proximal (n = 4), middle (n = 6), distal (n = 6), or double (n = 8) level of the tibia with distraction rhythm of three times per day. The remaining seven animals served as controls. Histomorphologic features of the lengthened muscles were characterized by a polymorphous appearance with foci of necrosis, atrophy, and sclerosis scattered among apparently normal muscle fibers. The intensity and dispersion of degenerative changes were in direct proportion to the amount of lengthening but in reverse proportion to the frequency of distraction. Tibial lengthening at the diaphysis caused intense fibroblast proliferation and remarkable muscle sclerosis, whereas metaphyseal distraction was associated with a predominance of muscle tissue regeneration over atrophy and sclerosis. Bifocal lengthening and a more fractionated rhythm of distraction were associated with enhanced preservation of existing muscle fibers and greater regenerative activity of the muscle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11249173     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200103000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

Review 1.  Distraction histogenesis of the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Aydin Gülses; Metin Sencimen; Mustafa Ayna; Matthias Gierloff; Yahya Açil
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-18

2.  Botulinum toxin a does not decrease calf pain or improve ROM during limb lengthening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Keun Jung Ryu; Dong Eun Shin; Hyun Woo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Structural changes in the lengthened rabbit muscle.

Authors:  Károly Pap; Sándor Berki; Tamás Shisha; Sándor Kiss; György Szoke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Safety and efficacy of botox injection in alleviating post-operative pain and improving quality of life in lower extremity limb lengthening and deformity correction.

Authors:  Reggie C Hamdy; Kathleen Montpetit; Joanne Ruck-Gibis; Kelly Thorstad; Ellen Raney; Michael Aiona; Robert Platt; Allen Finley; William Mackenzie; James McCarthy; Unni Narayanan
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  The biology of distraction osteogenesis for correction of mandibular and craniomaxillofacial defects: A review.

Authors:  Subodh Shankar Natu; Iqbal Ali; Sarwar Alam; Kolli Yada Giri; Anshita Agarwal; Vrishali Ajit Kulkarni
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-01

6.  Preliminary experience with motorized distraction for tibial lengthening.

Authors:  Adam S Bright; John E Herzenberg; Dror Paley; Ian Weiner; Rolf D Burghardt
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2014-03-15

7.  Benefits of Ilizarov automated bone distraction for nerves and articular cartilage in experimental leg lengthening.

Authors:  Nathalia Shchudlo; Tatyana Varsegova; Tatyana Stupina; Michael Shchudlo; Marat Saifutdinov; Andrey Yemanov
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-09-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.