PURPOSE: The value of 18FDG-PET to predict the outcome after therapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma was compared to morphologic staging and ESR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 50 concurrent 18FDG-PET and CT studies were performed in 37 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. ESR was evaluated 32 times after treatment was completed. RESULTS: Out of 39 residual masses found by CT 8 relapses could be proven. Out of 11 CT exams with CR 3 relapses occurred. CT turned out to show a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 72%, 21%, 21%, 73%, and 32%, with respect to predict disease-free survival (DFS). 18FDG-PET was positive in 22 examinations with 10 recurrences in this group. Out of 28 negative 18FDG-PET 1 relapse developed 3 years later. 18FDG-PET turned out to show promising sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 91%, 69%, 46%, 96%, 74%, with respect to predict DFS. ESR was elevated in 12 studies of which 5 relapses could be proven, while out of 20 normal ESR-studies 3 relapses occurred. Thus, ESR turned out to show sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 63%, 71%, 42%, 85%, and 75%, with respect to predict DFS. In summary, only 18FDG-PET was able to predict DFS statistically significant. CONCLUSION: 18FDG-PET can be very useful in patients with residual masses after treatment.
PURPOSE: The value of 18FDG-PET to predict the outcome after therapy in Hodgkin's lymphoma was compared to morphologic staging and ESR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 50 concurrent 18FDG-PET and CT studies were performed in 37 patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma. ESR was evaluated 32 times after treatment was completed. RESULTS: Out of 39 residual masses found by CT 8 relapses could be proven. Out of 11 CT exams with CR 3 relapses occurred. CT turned out to show a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 72%, 21%, 21%, 73%, and 32%, with respect to predict disease-free survival (DFS). 18FDG-PET was positive in 22 examinations with 10 recurrences in this group. Out of 28 negative 18FDG-PET 1 relapse developed 3 years later. 18FDG-PET turned out to show promising sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 91%, 69%, 46%, 96%, 74%, with respect to predict DFS. ESR was elevated in 12 studies of which 5 relapses could be proven, while out of 20 normal ESR-studies 3 relapses occurred. Thus, ESR turned out to show sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of 63%, 71%, 42%, 85%, and 75%, with respect to predict DFS. In summary, only 18FDG-PET was able to predict DFS statistically significant. CONCLUSION:18FDG-PET can be very useful in patients with residual masses after treatment.
Authors: Carsten Kobe; Markus Dietlein; Jeremy Franklin; Jana Markova; Andreas Lohri; Holger Amthauer; Susanne Klutmann; Wolfram H Knapp; Josee M Zijlstra; Andreas Bockisch; Matthias Weckesser; Reinhard Lorenz; Mathias Schreckenberger; Roland Bares; Hans T Eich; Rolf-Peter Mueller; Michael Fuchs; Peter Borchmann; Harald Schicha; Volker Diehl; Andreas Engert Journal: Blood Date: 2008-08-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: H T Eich; J Kriz; H Schmidberger; B Böll; B Klimm; M Rancea; R-P Müller; A Engert Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Richard T Hoppe; Ranjana H Advani; Weiyun Z Ai; Richard F Ambinder; Patricia Aoun; Celeste M Bello; Cecil M Benitez; Philip J Bierman; Kristie A Blum; Robert Chen; Bouthaina Dabaja; Andres Forero; Leo I Gordon; Francisco J Hernandez-Ilizaliturri; Ephraim P Hochberg; Jiayi Huang; Patrick B Johnston; Nadia Khan; David G Maloney; Peter M Mauch; Monika Metzger; Joseph O Moore; David Morgan; Craig H Moskowitz; Carolyn Mulroney; Matthew Poppe; Rachel Rabinovitch; Stuart Seropian; Christina Tsien; Jane N Winter; Joachim Yahalom; Jennifer L Burns; Hema Sundar Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 11.908