OBJECTIVES: To define the potential role of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate (CSAP) as a treatment option for patients with localized prostate carcinoma (PCA), we performed a retrospective outcomes analysis of a large database of patients undergoing CSAP constructed from five institutions and compared this with matching outcomes from contemporary reports of patient outcomes after radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 975 patients who underwent CSAP as primary therapy from January 1993 to January 1998 with sufficient outcomes data available were identified. Patients were stratified into three groups on the basis of their clinical features. Biochemical-free survival (BFS), post-CSAP biopsy results, and post-CSAP morbidities were calculated and recorded. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 24 months. The percentages of patients in the low, medium, and high-risk groups were 25%, 34%, and 41%, respectively. For prostate-specific antigen thresholds of less than 0.5 and less than 1.0 ng/mL, the 5-year actuarial BFS ranged from 36% to 61% and 45% to 76%, respectively, depending on the risk category. Overall, the positive biopsy rate was 18%. Morbidities included impotence in 93%, incontinence in 7.5%, rectourethral fistula in 0.5%, and transurethral resection of the prostate in 13% of patients (10% approved warming catheters versus 40% nonapproved). CONCLUSIONS: For each risk group, the 5-year BFS and positive biopsy rate after CSAP was comparable to matching outcomes reported after radiotherapy. Morbidities also seemed comparable, with impotence rates higher and rectal injury rates lower after CSAP than after radiotherapy. These data indicate that CSAP can be performed with low morbidity and can produce cancer-related results comparable to those reported for patients undergoing radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVES: To define the potential role of cryosurgical ablation of the prostate (CSAP) as a treatment option for patients with localized prostate carcinoma (PCA), we performed a retrospective outcomes analysis of a large database of patients undergoing CSAP constructed from five institutions and compared this with matching outcomes from contemporary reports of patient outcomes after radiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 975 patients who underwent CSAP as primary therapy from January 1993 to January 1998 with sufficient outcomes data available were identified. Patients were stratified into three groups on the basis of their clinical features. Biochemical-free survival (BFS), post-CSAP biopsy results, and post-CSAP morbidities were calculated and recorded. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 24 months. The percentages of patients in the low, medium, and high-risk groups were 25%, 34%, and 41%, respectively. For prostate-specific antigen thresholds of less than 0.5 and less than 1.0 ng/mL, the 5-year actuarial BFS ranged from 36% to 61% and 45% to 76%, respectively, depending on the risk category. Overall, the positive biopsy rate was 18%. Morbidities included impotence in 93%, incontinence in 7.5%, rectourethral fistula in 0.5%, and transurethral resection of the prostate in 13% of patients (10% approved warming catheters versus 40% nonapproved). CONCLUSIONS: For each risk group, the 5-year BFS and positive biopsy rate after CSAP was comparable to matching outcomes reported after radiotherapy. Morbidities also seemed comparable, with impotence rates higher and rectal injury rates lower after CSAP than after radiotherapy. These data indicate that CSAP can be performed with low morbidity and can produce cancer-related results comparable to those reported for patients undergoing radiotherapy.
Authors: John M Baust; Daniel P Klossner; Anthony Robilotto; Robert G Vanbuskirk; Andrew A Gage; Vladimir Mouraviev; Thomas J Polascik; John G Baust Journal: BJU Int Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Reena Sachdev; Laurent Salomon; Mohamed A Ghafar; Brian C Stisser; Ridwan Shabsigh; Aaron E Katz Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2003-10-21 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: J G Baust; D P Klossner; R G Vanbuskirk; A A Gage; V Mouraviev; T J Polascik; J M Baust Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 5.554