Literature DB >> 11247994

Unilateral hearing losses alter loud sound-induced temporary threshold shifts and efferent effects in the normal-hearing ear.

R Rajan1.   

Abstract

In animals with bilaterally normal hearing, olivocochlear pathways can protect the cochlea from the temporary shifts in hearing sensitivity (temporary threshold shifts; TTSs) caused by short-duration intense loud sounds. The crossed olivocochlear pathway provides protection during binaural loud sound, and uncrossed pathways protect when monaural or binaural loud sounds occur in noise backgrounds. Here I demonstrate that when there is a chronic unilateral hearing loss, effects of loud sounds, and efferent effects on loud sound, in the normal-hearing ear differ markedly from normal. Three categories of test animals with unilateral hearing loss were tested for effects at the normal-hearing ear. In all categories a monaural loud tone to the normal-hearing ear produced lower-than-normal TTSs, apparently because of a tonic re-setting of that ear's susceptibility to loud sound. Second, in the two test categories in which the hearing-loss ear was only partly damaged, binaural loud sound exacerbated TTSs in the normal-hearing ear because it caused threshold shifts that were a combination of "pure" TTSs and uncrossed efferent suppression of cochlear sensitivity. (In normal cats, this binaural tone results in crossed olivocochlear protection that reduces TTS.) Binaural loud sound did not produce such uncrossed efferent effects in the test category in which the nontest ear had suffered total hearing loss, suggesting that this uncrossed efferent effect required binaural input to the CNS. It is noteworthy that, in the absence of this uncrossed efferent suppression, the pure loud sound-alone induced TTSs after binaural exposure were low. Thus in the absence of any efferent effect, the normal-hearing cochlea had a reduced susceptibility to loud tone-induced damage. Finally, the results suggest that, with respect to cochlear actions at high sound levels, uncrossed and crossed efferent pathways may exert different effects at the one type of receptor cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11247994     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.3.1257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

Review 1.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

2.  Influence of single-sided deafness on the auditory capacity of the better ear.

Authors:  S Arndt; T Wesarg; Y Stelzig; R Jacob; A Illg; A Lesinski-Schiedat; M C Ketterer; A Aschendorff; I Speck
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Contralateral cochlear effects of ipsilateral damage: no evidence for interaural coupling.

Authors:  Erik Larsen; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Gentamicin abolishes all cochlear effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  W H A M Mulders; D Robertson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Protection from noise-induced hearing loss by Kv2.2 potassium currents in the central medial olivocochlear system.

Authors:  Huaxia Tong; Cornelia Kopp-Scheinpflug; Nadia Pilati; Susan W Robinson; James L Sinclair; Joern R Steinert; Margaret Barnes-Davies; Rebecca Allfree; Blair D Grubb; Samuel M Young; Ian D Forsythe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The olivocochlear system and protection from acoustic trauma: a mini literature review.

Authors:  Adrian Fuente
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.