Literature DB >> 11247958

Effect of load on preferred speed and cost of transport.

S J Wickler1, D F Hoyt, E A Cogger, K M Hall.   

Abstract

Horses have a tendency to utilize a relatively narrow set of speeds near the middle of a much broader range they are capable of using within a particular gait, i.e., a preferred speed. Possible explanations for this behavior include minimizing musculoskeletal stresses and maximizing metabolic economy. If metabolic economy (cost of transport, CT) and preferred speeds are linked, then shifts in CT should produce shifts in preferred speed. To test this hypothesis, preferred speed was measured in trotting horses (n = 7) unloaded on the level and loaded with 19% of their body weight on the level. The preferred speed on the level was 3.33 +/- 0.09 (SE) m/s, and this decreased to 3.13 +/- 0.11 m/s when loaded. In both conditions (no load and load), the rate of O2 consumption (n = 3) was a curvilinear function of speed that produced a minimum CT (i.e., speed at which trotting is most economical). When unloaded, the speed at which CT was minimum was very near the preferred speed. With a load, CT decreased and the minimum was also near the preferred speed of horses while carrying a load.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11247958     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.4.1548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  6 in total

1.  Effect of load and speed on the energetic cost of human walking.

Authors:  G J Bastien; P A Willems; B Schepens; N C Heglund
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Gait-specific energetics contributes to economical walking and running in emus and ostriches.

Authors:  Rebecca R Watson; Jonas Rubenson; Lisa Coder; Donald F Hoyt; Matthew W G Propert; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Movement Vigor as a Reflection of Subjective Economic Utility.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr; Thomas R Reppert; Erik M Summerside; Tehrim Yoon; Alaa A Ahmed
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Reproductive costs for everyone: how female loads impact human mobility strategies.

Authors:  Cara M Wall-Scheffler; Marcella J Myers
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Human footprint variation while performing load bearing tasks.

Authors:  Cara M Wall-Scheffler; Janelle Wagnild; Emily Wagler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Quantifying the Impact of Mounted Load Carrying on Equids: A Review.

Authors:  Syed S U H Bukhari; Alan G McElligott; Rebecca S V Parkes
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.