Literature DB >> 11247846

A molecular explanation for the long-term suppression of circadian rhythms by a single light pulse.

J C Leloup1, A Goldbeter.   

Abstract

With the use of a molecular model for circadian rhythms in Drosophila based on transcriptional regulation, we show how a single, critical pulse of light can permanently suppress circadian rhythmicity, whereas a second light pulse can restore the abolished rhythm. The phenomena occur via the pulsatile induction of either protein degradation or gene expression in conditions in which a stable steady state coexists with stable circadian oscillations of the limit cycle type. The model indicates that suppression by a light pulse can only be accounted for by assuming that the biochemical effects of such a pulse much outlast its actual duration. We determine the characteristics of critical pulses suppressing the oscillations as a function of the phase at which the rhythm is perturbed. The model predicts how the amplitude and duration of the biochemical changes induced by critical pulses vary with this phase. The results provide a molecular, dynamic explanation for the long-term suppression of circadian rhythms observed in a variety of organisms in response to a single light pulse and for the subsequent restoration of the rhythms by a second light pulse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11247846     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.4.R1206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  10 in total

1.  Architecture-dependent robustness and bistability in a class of genetic circuits.

Authors:  Jiajun Zhang; Zhanjiang Yuan; Han-Xiong Li; Tianshou Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Molecular mechanism of suppression of circadian rhythms by a critical stimulus.

Authors:  Guocun Huang; Lixin Wang; Yi Liu
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Effects of morning and evening exposures to blue light of varying illuminance on ocular growth rates and ocular rhythms in chicks.

Authors:  Debora L Nickla; Frances Rucker; Christopher P Taylor; Shanta Sarfare; William Chen; Jonathan Elin-Calcador; Xia Wang
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Phase resetting and phase singularity of an insect circannual oscillator.

Authors:  Yosuke Miyazaki; Tomoyosi Nisimura; Hideharu Numata
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Transient resetting: a novel mechanism for synchrony and its biological examples.

Authors:  Chunguang Li; Luonan Chen; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  It is not the parts, but how they interact that determines the behaviour of circadian rhythms across scales and organisms.

Authors:  Daniel DeWoskin; Weihua Geng; Adam R Stinchcombe; Daniel B Forger
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Multi-rhythmicity generated by coupling two cellular rhythms.

Authors:  Jie Yan; Albert Goldbeter
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Controlling circadian rhythms by dark-pulse perturbations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Hirokazu Fukuda; Haruhiko Murase; Isao T Tokuda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Common features in diverse insect clocks.

Authors:  Hideharu Numata; Yosuke Miyazaki; Tomoko Ikeno
Journal:  Zoological Lett       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 2.836

10.  A Mathematical Model to Characterize the Role of Light Adaptation in Mammalian Circadian Clock.

Authors:  Yuzeng Shi; Yu Liu; Ling Yang; Jie Yan
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-12-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.