Literature DB >> 11247093

Longitudinal follow-up of naturalistic treatment outcome in patients with trichotillomania.

N J Keuthen1, C Fraim, T Deckersbach, D D Dougherty, L Baer, M A Jenike.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the longitudinal course of treatment outcome in patients with trichotillomania. The authors conducted a second follow-up assessment on a cohort of hair pullers previously studied.
METHOD: Forty-four subjects completed a hair-pulling questionnaire and paper-and-pencil measures of hair-pulling severity and impact, psychosocial functioning, depression, anxiety, and self-esteem. Mean time elapsed between the first and second follow-up assessment was 2.5 years (index evaluation to first follow-up = 3.5 years).
RESULTS: Twenty-seven subjects (61.4%) had active treatment since the first follow-up. No significant changes in hair pulling, depression, anxiety, or psychosocial functioning were reported from first to second follow-up. Self-esteem scores significantly worsened during this period (p = .000). A trend toward worsening also existed for psychosocial impact scores. Comparison of scores at index evaluation with second follow-up still showed significant improvement over time for hair pulling (p = .001) but significant worsening in self-esteem (p = .000). Treatment and responder status were unrelated to clinical functioning, with the exception of depression and psychosocial impact.
CONCLUSION: Although hair pullers exhibit initial improvement with treatment, scale scores plateau or worsen by second follow-up. Significant worsening in self-esteem at second follow-up may be related to the absence of further improvements in hair-pulling severity. Future research should focus on the interrelationships among self-esteem, depression, and hair pulling during treatment for this disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11247093     DOI: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  6 in total

Review 1.  Should an obsessive-compulsive spectrum grouping of disorders be included in DSM-V?

Authors:  Katharine A Phillips; Dan J Stein; Scott L Rauch; Eric Hollander; Brian A Fallon; Arthur Barsky; Naomi Fineberg; David Mataix-Cols; Ygor Arzeno Ferrão; Sanjaya Saxena; Sabine Wilhelm; Megan M Kelly; Lee Anna Clark; Anthony Pinto; O Joseph Bienvenu; Joanne Farrow; James Leckman
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.505

2.  LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN PEDIATRIC TRICHOTILLOMANIA.

Authors:  Maya C Schumer; Kaitlyn E Panza; Jilian M Mulqueen; Ewgeni Jakubovski; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.505

3.  Behavior therapy for pediatric trichotillomania: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martin E Franklin; Aubrey L Edson; Deborah A Ledley; Shawn P Cahill
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 8.829

4.  N-Acetylcysteine in the treatment of pediatric trichotillomania: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on trial.

Authors:  Michael H Bloch; Kaitlyn E Panza; Jon E Grant; Christopher Pittenger; James F Leckman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Comorbidity and quality of life in adults with hair pulling disorder.

Authors:  David C Houghton; Joyce Maas; Michael P Twohig; Stephen M Saunders; Scott N Compton; Angela M Neal-Barnett; Martin E Franklin; Douglas W Woods
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Trichotillomania: the impact of treatment history on the outcome of an Internet-based intervention.

Authors:  Steffi Weidt; Annette Beatrix Bruehl; Aba Delsignore; Gwyneth Zai; Alexa Kuenburg; Richard Klaghofer; Michael Rufer
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.