M Fichter1, N Quadflieg. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: For reliable and valid assessment and diagnostic categorization of eating disorders, self-report measures have considerable limitations. A semi-structured interview - the SIAB-EX - was developed for a more reliable and valid assessment of eating disorders. METHODS: One study (videotapes of 31 inpatients, seven raters) was made to establish inter-rater reliability; in another study with 80 patients the SIAB-EX was compared to another semi-structured interview designed for comparable purposes (EDE). In a third study data was obtained on 377 eating disorder patients seeking treatment to explore discriminant and convergent (construct) validity using the following self-rating scales: EDI, TFEQ, SCL-90, BDI, and the PERI Demoralization Scale. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of dichotomous ratings was good with mean kappa values of.81 (current) and.85 (past). Comparison of the SIAB-EX with the EDE generally showed quite similar results and higher intercorrelation of the total scale (.77). There are, however, a number of differences between the two scales, which are discussed in detail. Construct validity of the SIAB-EX was established. CONCLUSION: Inter-rater reliability was good. Convergent and discriminant (construct) validity of the SIAB-EX was demonstrated. The constructs assessed by the SIAB and its subscales and items are discussed in the context of their correlations with other well-known scales.
OBJECTIVE: For reliable and valid assessment and diagnostic categorization of eating disorders, self-report measures have considerable limitations. A semi-structured interview - the SIAB-EX - was developed for a more reliable and valid assessment of eating disorders. METHODS: One study (videotapes of 31 inpatients, seven raters) was made to establish inter-rater reliability; in another study with 80 patients the SIAB-EX was compared to another semi-structured interview designed for comparable purposes (EDE). In a third study data was obtained on 377 eating disorderpatients seeking treatment to explore discriminant and convergent (construct) validity using the following self-rating scales: EDI, TFEQ, SCL-90, BDI, and the PERI Demoralization Scale. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of dichotomous ratings was good with mean kappa values of.81 (current) and.85 (past). Comparison of the SIAB-EX with the EDE generally showed quite similar results and higher intercorrelation of the total scale (.77). There are, however, a number of differences between the two scales, which are discussed in detail. Construct validity of the SIAB-EX was established. CONCLUSION: Inter-rater reliability was good. Convergent and discriminant (construct) validity of the SIAB-EX was demonstrated. The constructs assessed by the SIAB and its subscales and items are discussed in the context of their correlations with other well-known scales.
Authors: M Föcker; N Timmesfeld; S Scherag; K Bühren; M Langkamp; A Dempfle; E M Sheridan; M de Zwaan; C Fleischhaker; W Herzog; K Egberts; S Zipfel; B Herpertz-Dahlmann; J Hebebrand Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2011-01-22 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Fabio Bernardoni; Nadine Bernhardt; Shakoor Pooseh; Joseph A. King; Daniel Geisler; Franziska Ritschel; Ilka Boehm; Maria Seidel; Veit Roessner; Michael N. Smolka; Stefan Ehrlich Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Daniel Geisler; Viola Borchardt; Anton R Lord; Ilka Boehm; Franziska Ritschel; Johannes Zwipp; Sabine Clas; Joseph A King; Silvia Wolff-Stephan; Veit Roessner; Martin Walter; Stefan Ehrlich Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.186