Literature DB >> 11246216

Evaluation of the rodent micronucleus assay by a 28-day treatment protocol: Summary of the 13th Collaborative Study by the Collaborative Study Group for the Micronucleus Test (CSGMT)/Environmental Mutagen Society of Japan (JEMS)-Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group (MMS).

S Hamada1, S Sutou, T Morita, A Wakata, S Asanami, S Hosoya, S Ozawa, K Kondo, M Nakajima, H Shimada, K Osawa, Y Kondo, N Asano, S Sato, H Tamura, N Yajima, R Marshall, C Moore, D H Blakey, L M Schechtman, J L Weaver, D K Torous, R Proudlock, S Ito, C Namiki, M Hayashi.   

Abstract

To examine whether micronucleus tests can be incorporated into general toxicology assays, we performed micronucleus tests applying the treatment protocols typically used in such assays. In this 13th Collaborative Study of the CSGMT, both rats and mice were tested, although rats were used in the majority of the studies. Fifteen mutagens were tested in rats, mainly by oral (p.o.) administration. Micronucleus induction was evaluated 2, 3, and 4 days, and 1, 2, 3, and 28 days after the beginning of the treatment in the peripheral blood, and at 28 days in the bone marrow. Of the 15 chemicals that induced micronuclei in rats in short-term assays, two chemicals (1,2-dimethylhydrazine.2HCl and mitomycin C) were negative in all our experiments, possibly because of insufficient dose levels. The remaining 13 were positive within the estimated dose range of a general toxicology assay, suggesting the possibility of integrating the micronucleus assay into general toxicology assays. Three patterns were observed in micronucleus induction during the period of repeated treatment: (1) gradual increases in micronucleus frequency with sequential doses, (2) a peak at 3-5 days followed by gradual decreases in micronucleus frequency with sequential doses, and (3) a rapid increase in micronucleus frequency followed by a plateau. We evaluated factors that might have been involved in those patterns, such as the spleen function, target organ exposure, extramedullary hematopoiesis, hypothermia, and hypoxia. Another factor we considered was dosage. Because the dosages employed in a general toxicity assay are usually lower than those used in short-term micronucleus assays, this discrepancy was considered the greatest potential problem for integrating the micronucleus assay into general toxicology assays. Our results indicate that the integration of the micronucleus assay into a 28-day toxicological assay is feasible. To serve this purpose, blood samples collected 4 days after the beginning of treatment and blood and bone marrow samples collected at autopsy should be examined. Furthermore, although it is recognized that mice may be suitable for performing independent micronucleus assays, we propose that rats can provide biologically important and relevant information regarding potential chemical mutagens that can be evaluated under conditions used in the conduct of general toxicology studies. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11246216     DOI: 10.1002/em.1017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  5 in total

1.  Rat Pig-a mutation assay responds to the genotoxic carcinogen ethyl carbamate but not the non-genotoxic carcinogen methyl carbamate.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Bemis; Carson Labash; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Kristine Carlson; Ariel Berg; Dorothea K Torous; Matthew Barragato; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Automated human blood micronucleated reticulocyte measurements for rapid assessment of chromosomal damage.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Richard K Miller; Kelly Brewer; Therese Smudzin; Dorothea K Torous; Daniel J Roberts; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Steven M Bryce; Siva Sugunan; Yuhchyau Chen
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Integration of mutation and chromosomal damage endpoints into 28-day repeat dose toxicology studies.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Souk Phonethepswath; Dean Franklin; Pamela Weller; Dorothea K Torous; Steven M Bryce; Svetlana Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Ollivier Hyrien; James Palis; James T MacGregor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Estimating the carcinogenic potency of chemicals from the in vivo micronucleus test.

Authors:  Lya G Soeteman-Hernández; George E Johnson; Wout Slob
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 5.  The micronucleus test-most widely used in vivo genotoxicity test.

Authors:  Makoto Hayashi
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2016-10-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.