Confounding factors in toxicity testing.

The necessity for understanding normal human functions and the mechanisms which underlie dysfunction in these processes is essential in the promotion of a healthier lifestyle. To achieve this goal utilization of a suitable animal model is necessary in order to develop new pharmaceutical agents to alleviate diseases or chemicals to enhance the quality of life. It is incumbent upon investigators to choose a species in which pharmacokinetic principles are established and it is important that these phenomena resemble those of the humans. The choice of rats has specific advantages in that these rodents possess similar pharmacodynamic parameters to humans. Other advantages include availability, low cost, ease of breeding, and an extensive literature data-base to enable comparisons to present findings. However, in the interpretation of data from animals to humans, there are factors which need to be recognized as playing important roles in chemical-induced outcomes. The confounding factors include strain, supplier, age, gender, hormonal status and dietary intake. The aim of this article is to demonstrate that there are differences in the responsiveness of rat stock/strains to chemicals and that lack of consideration of confounding factors yields inappropriate conclusions regarding risk assessment for humans.