R W Lam1, E M Tam, L N Yatham, I S Shiah, A P Zis. 1. Division of Mood Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia Hospital, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, 2255 Wesbrook Mall, BC, Canada V6T 2A1. rlam@interchange.ubc.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In DSM-IV, winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is classified as a seasonal pattern of recurrent major depressive episodes in winter with full remission of symptoms in summer. However, other groups with "winter depression" have been identified, including patients with incomplete summer remission (ISR) and subsyndromal SAD (sub-SAD, winter depressive symptoms that do not meet criteria for major depression). In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics of these three seasonal groups and their response to light therapy. METHOD: 558 patients assessed at a specialized SAD Clinic were diagnosed using DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria. Clinical information was recorded using a checklist at index assessment. A subset of patients (N=192) were treated with an open, 2 week trial of light therapy using a 10000 lux fluorescent light box for 30 min per day in the early morning. Patients were assessed before and after treatment with the 29 item modified Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and clinical response was defined as greater than 50% improvement in scores. RESULTS: The rates of some melancholic symptoms, anxiety, panic, suicidal ideation, and family history of mood disorder were lowest in the sub-SAD group. The clinical response rates to light therapy were highest in the sub-SAD group (N=32, 78%), intermediate in the SAD group (N=113, 66%), and lowest in the ISR group (N=47, 51%). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study of patients seen in a specialty clinic, although information was obtained in a standardized format. The light therapy trial had an open design so that placebo response could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in both the patterns of clinical symptoms and the response to light therapy in these three groups with winter depression. These results are consistent with a dual vulnerability hypothesis that considers these groups to result from interaction of separate factors for seasonality and depression.
OBJECTIVE: In DSM-IV, winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is classified as a seasonal pattern of recurrent major depressive episodes in winter with full remission of symptoms in summer. However, other groups with "winter depression" have been identified, including patients with incomplete summer remission (ISR) and subsyndromal SAD (sub-SAD, winter depressive symptoms that do not meet criteria for major depression). In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics of these three seasonal groups and their response to light therapy. METHOD: 558 patients assessed at a specialized SAD Clinic were diagnosed using DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria. Clinical information was recorded using a checklist at index assessment. A subset of patients (N=192) were treated with an open, 2 week trial of light therapy using a 10000 lux fluorescent light box for 30 min per day in the early morning. Patients were assessed before and after treatment with the 29 item modified Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and clinical response was defined as greater than 50% improvement in scores. RESULTS: The rates of some melancholic symptoms, anxiety, panic, suicidal ideation, and family history of mood disorder were lowest in the sub-SAD group. The clinical response rates to light therapy were highest in the sub-SAD group (N=32, 78%), intermediate in the SAD group (N=113, 66%), and lowest in the ISR group (N=47, 51%). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study of patients seen in a specialty clinic, although information was obtained in a standardized format. The light therapy trial had an open design so that placebo response could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in both the patterns of clinical symptoms and the response to light therapy in these three groups with winter depression. These results are consistent with a dual vulnerability hypothesis that considers these groups to result from interaction of separate factors for seasonality and depression.
Authors: Shannon D Donofry; Kathryn A Roecklein; Kelly J Rohan; Jennifer E Wildes; Marissa L Kamarck Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-03-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Hira Mohyuddin; Polymnia Georgiou; Abhishek Wadhawan; Melanie L Daue; Lisa A Brenner; Claudia Gragnoli; Erika F H Saunders; Dietmar Fuchs; Christopher A Lowry; Teodor T Postolache Journal: Pteridines Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 0.581
Authors: Uttam K Raheja; Sarah H Stephens; Braxton D Mitchell; Kelly J Rohan; Dipika Vaswani; Theodora G Balis; Gagan V Nijjar; Aamar Sleemi; Toni I Pollin; Kathleen Ryan; Gloria M Reeves; Nancy Weitzel; Mary Morrissey; Hassaan Yousufi; Patricia Langenberg; Alan R Shuldiner; Teodor T Postolache Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-11-17 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Layan Zhang; Daniel S Evans; Uttam K Raheja; Sarah H Stephens; John W Stiller; Gloria M Reeves; Mary Johnson; Kathleen A Ryan; Nancy Weizel; Dipika Vaswani; Hassan McLain; Alan R Shuldiner; Braxton D Mitchell; Wen-Chi Hsueh; Soren Snitker; Teodor T Postolache Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-11-28 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Faisal Akram; Claudia Gragnoli; Uttam K Raheja; Soren Snitker; Christopher A Lowry; Kelly A Stearns-Yoder; Andrew J Hoisington; Lisa A Brenner; Erika Saunders; John W Stiller; Kathleen A Ryan; Kelly J Rohan; Braxton D Mitchell; Teodor T Postolache Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 4.791