Literature DB >> 11245507

Use of fake tanning lotions in the South Australian population.

K R Beckmann1, B A Kirke, K A McCaul, D M Roder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the use of fake tanning lotions and repeated sunburn among South Australian adults, with a view to informing the Anti-Cancer Foundation of South Australia's (ACFSA) policy on fake tanning products. STUDY
DESIGN: Population survey. PARTICIPANTS: 2005 South Australians aged 18 years or older, selected randomly from the electronic White Pages. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported use of fake tanning lotions in the past 12 months; frequency of sunburn over summer; and various sun-protective behaviours.
RESULTS: 2,005 of the 2,536 eligible participants (79%) were surveyed by telephone. Fake tan use was most prevalent among women (15.9%), people aged 18-24 years (15.4%), and people with household incomes above $40 000 per year (11.9%). Fake tan users were more likely than non-users to use sunscreens (81.3% v 56.5%; P < 0.001), but less likely to take other precautions such as wearing hats (40.9% v 51.0%; P = 0.04) and protective clothing (22.3% v 34.1%; P = 0.005). They were also more likely to report having been burnt more than once over summer (26.2% v 16.5%; P = 0.025). Multivariate analysis indicates a statistically significant association between fake tan use and repeated sunburn (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-3.69), which was independent of age, sex, skin type and sun-protection practices.
CONCLUSION: Users of fake tanning products may be at greater risk of repeated sunburn. The ACFSA sees no justification at this stage for altering its present policy position of not actively promoting the use of fake tanning lotions as a means of reducing sunburn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11245507     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143158.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  Indoor Tanning, Sunless Tanning, and Sun-Protection Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Men.

Authors:  Yi Gao; Sarah T Arron; Eleni Linos; Ingrid Polcari; Matthew D Mansh
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

2.  The sunless study: a beach randomized trial of a skin cancer prevention intervention promoting sunless tanning.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Jessica Oleski; Jamie S Bodenlos; Yunsheng Ma
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2010-09

3.  Strategies to reduce indoor tanning: current research gaps and future opportunities for prevention.

Authors:  Dawn M Holman; Kathleen A Fox; Jeffrey D Glenn; Gery P Guy; Meg Watson; Katie Baker; Vilma Cokkinides; Mark Gottlieb; DeAnn Lazovich; Frank M Perna; Blake P Sampson; Andrew B Seidenberg; Craig Sinclair; Alan C Geller
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  A colorimetric comparison of sunless with natural skin tan.

Authors:  Kinjiro Amano; Kaida Xiao; Sophie Wuerger; Georg Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Design and methods for a cluster randomized trial of the Sunless Study: a skin cancer prevention intervention promoting sunless tanning among beach visitors.

Authors:  Sherry L Pagoto; Kristin L Schneider; Jessica Oleski; Jamie S Bodenlos; Philip Merriam; Yunsheng Ma
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.